Showing posts with label New Mexico. Show all posts
Showing posts with label New Mexico. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 17, 2010

The impacts of uranium mining on indigenous communities.

Great Bear Lake, Canada (so pretty, what is wrong with people who want to destroy such a lovely place for mining?)

Comment:  Great article, please read about the same false truths that the Canadians tell about the benefits of uranium mining to their locals are the same false truths that the local uranium company are telling Virginia leaders and our people!  Demand our leaders to ban uranium mining and milling now!

 Posted by: joan.Russow on http://PEJ.org
Saturday, February 13, 2010 - 05:12 AM
Heather Tufts

The climate change debate positions nuclear power as a partial solution to carbon emissions according to some scientists and politicians. Uranium mining speculation lacks comprehensive health and safety regulations while the ethics of Canadian exported uranium, which can lead to depleted uranium used in zones of war, needs greater scrutiny.

Abandoned uranium mines and the subsequent hazards experienced in forgotten communities have also been virtually ignored in Canada leading to tragic, unmitigated circumstances.

The long-term negative impacts of uranium mining can be witnessed in the small, rural community of Déline (North West Territories) which has a Dené population of 800 people. They are located right on the shore of Sahtu (Great Bear Lake) about 300 miles north of Yellowknife. Great Bear Lake is considered to be one of the last great fresh water lakes in the world. This area on the north shore of Sahtu was the site of radium mining from 1934 to 1939, and then a uranium mine from 1943 to 1962.

During the mining era the Dené of Déline, mostly men worked as labourers and as coolies carrying gunny sacks of radioactive uranium ore and concentrates on the transportation route. Waste from both radium and uranium mines were dumped directly into the lake and used as landfill. Port Radium was owned and operated by a Canadian crown corporation but uranium ore and concentrates were extracted, milled and sold to the US Government for the Manhattan Project to build an atomic bomb during the Second World War.

Déline in the North West Territories.


The mine initially operated under the emergency regulations of the War Measures Act. No warnings were issued at the time about the hazardous and toxic nature of these ores and so people took no precautions regarding their drinking water or their traditional foods.

In 1975 young men from Déline were sent to work in the tunnels on a Government training program without masks for radon gas exposure. In 1997 ten young men were sent with only two hours of training to clean up "hot spots" of radioactive soil in Sawmill Bay without shower or decontamination facilities. Once again the Dené people of Déline were not informed of these hazardous exposures but recent information mean that they now live in constant fear of their contaminated land, water, animals with ongoing concerns about their health and survival.

Déline is known as the “village of widows’ because most of the men who worked as labourers in the mines have died of some form of cancer. The widows, who are traditional women, were left to raise their families without husbands and breadwinners. As a result they became dependent on welfare and relied on the young men who remained in the community to help supply them with their traditional foods. The women are struggling and the village is seeing the first generation of young men in the history of the Dené to grow up without the guidance and teachings of their grandfathers, fathers and uncles. This unfulfilled tradition threatens the cultural and spiritual survival of the only community on the Great Bear Lake.

In 1998 the Dené First Nation lobbied the federal government for compensation and mitigation. On September 6, 2005, Déline community members were given the disappointing findings of a five-year study to examine the health and environmental impacts of the government-owned radium and uranium mine which had operated for almost thirty years in Déline. Although the community had lost 15 former ore transport workers to cancer the report stated that the numbers of deaths were insufficient to prove unequivocally the link to the mine.

By not acknowledging the full health consequences of uranium mining the government offloads the responsibility to compensate or provide justice to the Dené First Nation. To date consultations with government are still underway with anticipated costs for remediation in the millions of dollars. An agreement about cause and affect has not yet been reached. In a related situation in Port Hope Ontario, NDP MP Nathan Cullen called for an investigation in 2007 into Health Canada’s denials of the health risks of uranium contamination with the accusation that profits are influencing policy. These issues remain unresolved in 2010 even though increased uranium mining is imminent in some Canadian provinces.

Uranium exploration near the world famous Thelon Game Sanctuary in Nunavut alarmed the Dené and Inuit communities who are dependent on the caribou herds that use the area for grazing and calving. The current land use plan for Kivalliq (Keewatin) has been in place since 2000 and prohibits uranium mining in the region until Nunavut’s environmental assessment process has reviewed all the related environmental and health impact issues. In contradiction to the local land use plan Nunavut’s Inuit land claims commission adopted a policy in favour of uranium mining returning the legacy of uncertainty to the area. Their policy framework provides the tenuous rationale that uranium mining and nuclear energy could mitigate some of the climate change impacts in the north.

The policy does not account for the quantifiable fossil fuel usage in uranium exploration nor resolves issues about the impacts of nuclear waste storage. They assert that environmental and health concerns related to uranium mining have been resolved but provide no supporting evidence.

Dissention rapidly gained momentum from the Inuit in Baker Lake and the Hunters and Trappers Association who demanded a moratorium on all mining exploration. The vehement opposition to the uranium mine proposal near the Thelon Game Sanctuary eventually led the Mackenzie Valley Environmental Impact Review Board to recommend rejection of uranium exploration at Screech Lake in 2009.

Uranium development in Saskatchewan dates back to the 1930s when the first discoveries were made in the far north. Since that time controversial uranium exploitation has undergone several waves of investment and although it contributes to the nuclear industry and is opposed by many NGOs there has been virtually no opposition from any political party in Canada. Today uranium is one of Canada’s leading exports with the highest percentage being mined in the province of Saskatchewan on indigenous lands.

The land is rich in uranium deposits but this hazardous mining industry poses a considerable threat to the natural ecology and the values of people who live on the land. At the heart of this issue is a system of indigenous beliefs and culture which regards them as inseparable from the land, the waters and the animals. The impact of mining on their ancestral lands where they are the traditional custodians contravenes their spiritual and cultural beliefs.

Inside a uranium mine.

Conversely emerging job opportunities in a struggling northern economy have out of necessity led to the partial cooperation of some native bands with uranium mining projects. In 1993 the La Ronge Indian Band gave their support to the Kitsaki uranium mining development at Rabbit Lake citing increased economic benefits for their community, with the caveat that environmental impacts were closely monitored.

Employment opportunities are short-term and hazardous but highly financed propaganda to promote the benefits of uranium mining to northerners potentially trumps aboriginal self-determined, sustainable, economic alternatives.

Harding also argues that the geopolitical uses and long-term environmental effects are being hidden, and outweigh the short-term economic gain by which communities and governments are sometimes wooed. He cites the Harper government’s eager acceptance of nuclear energy as evidence that Canada is going down a path of misplaced intentions.

However the environmental, health and social impacts of uranium development extraction on aboriginal communities in the Canadian North remain an urgent concern to many communities.

Mining activity has altered the landscape through the construction of roads, new settlements and the underground mine sites.

Ore extraction and processing have released dangerous chemicals into the air and water and in spite of the participation of the ABDLP there is still a predominance of non-native labour which has displaced and marginalized local indigenous people.

Primarily it is the large multinationals, not the local people who benefit from the multi-million dollar uranium mining industry in Saskatchewan and elsewhere.

In the United States Canadian uranium mining speculation has increased in spite of indigenous opposition and a long legacy of life-threatening damages on Navajo Reservations.

Barrick Gold of Canada which nets profits of over 1.5 billion dollars a year is active in uranium exploration in New Mexico but it has not committed sufficient funds to adequately address the contamination that has already destroyed four aquifers in Navajo territory.

The uranium industry is attempting to convince the public that it will bring high-paying jobs and tax money to the state by buying advertisements in local papers and other news media while paying industry representatives to testify at hearings.

Four years ago, the 2006 Indigenous World Uranium Summit held in Navajo territory in the U.S. issued the following powerful declaration: “We, the Peoples gathered at the Indigenous World Uranium Summit, at this critical time of intensifying nuclear threats to Mother Earth and all life, demand a worldwide ban on uranium mining, processing, enrichment, fuel use, and weapons testing and deployment, and nuclear waste dumping on native lands.”


More than 300 participants from 14 countries participated in the event, with a variety of topics including international efforts to halt uranium mining, and the devastating effects on health and culture. Indignation grew as they realized that American Indian uranium miners in both the United States and Canada (Saskatchewan and NWT) had been sent to their deaths to work in the uranium mines long after scientists warned of the health hazards of radon gas and radiation.

Canada is the world’s largest producer of uranium with about 60% exported to the United States.

 Many abandoned uranium mines have left behind a devastating legacy but the nuclear industry has re-branded itself as a viable solution to global warming. The profitable Canadian uranium mining industry lacks serious scrutiny; meanwhile remote indigenous communities are especially vulnerable to hazardous impacts thinly veiled as economic promise.


Read more:
http://www.pej.org/html/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=8041&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0

Thursday, January 14, 2010

Uranium Mining a Poor Fix


Open Pit Uranium Mine in New Mexico!


Comment: A great article! People of Virginia, read the article because the Boom to Burst is familiar with the people of New Mexico, they are still living with the cancers and deaths from the last uranium boom. Our government has not clean up the polluting mess of past mines and milling. NM is allowing foreign countries to take their uranium, ruin their people lives for the dollar. Demand VA to ban uranium mining and milling!
Monday, January 11, 2010
By Eric Jantz
New Mexico Environmental Law Center

For several years, the nuclear and uranium mining industry have been hyping a new uranium boom in New Mexico and a nuclear "renaissance" nationwide.

The promises have been impressive — limitless carbon-free electricity from nuclear power, tens of thousands of jobs in the uranium mines for New Mexicans, and billions, that's right, with a "b," in revenues for New Mexico government.

Unfortunately, some New Mexico legislators have embraced the industry's slick public relations campaign and propagated its misinformation.

The more realistic assessment of New Mexico's fiscal fortunes with uranium mining is significantly more modest.

A recent economic analysis by Dr. Thomas Power, former economics department chair at the University of Montana and highly regarded resource economist, forecasts roughly 3,000 jobs and several million in revenues to the state from renewed uranium mining over 20 to 30 years.

While this might appear to benefit the state, these modest economic benefits pale in comparison to the anticipated costs to the public in the form of groundwater contamination, radioactive air pollution and disease.

Despite the well worn assurances from the uranium mining industry that its polluting days are behind it, contemporary uranium mining's environmental and public health record are as shameful as its historic record.

Furthermore, most of the proposed uranium mining projects in New Mexico are purely speculative.

Only one company of the many who have either submitted mine permit applications or exploration applications is sufficiently capitalized to actually build a mine. And that company only has enough capital because it has partnered with a Japanese multinational corporation, presumably to ship its uranium to overseas markets.

Even in a best-case scenario for industry, uranium mining wouldn't begin for five to seven years. This optimistic timeline would do absolutely nothing for New Mexico's current fiscal woes, which need attention immediately.

In the unlikely event the predicted boom comes to pass, it will be short lived.

Uranium is a finite resource, and host communities will be thrust headlong into the cruel cycle of boom and bust economies.

While those communities may see some economic benefit in the short term, soon enough the uranium mining companies will pack up and leave, leaving communities with the environmental and public health bill — and broke to boot.

The people in these communities saw it the last time the uranium market went bust, and they'll see it again.

So what's a state legislator to do?

 To start, maybe state legislators from uranium impacted communities should start listening to their constituents and stop shilling for out-of-state mining companies.

People in the northwestern part of the state are desperate for long-term, clean, and sustainable economic development. A good start would be to clean up the widespread contamination caused by the last uranium boom.

Thousands of jobs would be created by assessing the entire extent of contamination and remediating the billions of gallons of surface and groundwater and millions of acres of land contaminated by past uranium mining.

Elected officials could also work with communities to develop locally generated and distributed renewable electricity, which would bring green jobs and a clean, affordable energy source to run the local economy.

This would not only benefit communities now, it would be a long-term hedge against rising fossil fuel energy prices. Local energy could in turn run local sustainable agriculture, eco-tourism and other green businesses.

The last uranium "boom" sent shockwaves through the state that are still being felt years after the last pound of uranium was taken from the ground.

There is no good reason, economic or otherwise, to condemn communities still struggling under the burden of the last boom and bust to another cycle of woe.

Eric Jantz is an attorney for the New Mexico Environmental Law Center.

http://www.abqjournal.com/opinion/guest_columns/11223347977opinionguestcolumns01-11-10.htm

Wednesday, December 30, 2009

Environmental group plans to sue over coal ash at San Juan mine

Comment:  Modern mining so safe according the local uranium mining corporations in VA!  Don't think so!
EPA expected to issue new rules on coal ash in early 2010

By Marjorie Childress 12/29/09 12:01 AM

Groundwater near the San Juan coal mine in northwestern New Mexico is polluted.

That’s something that both the Sierra Club and New Mexico Mining and Minerals Division Director Bill Brancard agree on. What’s in dispute is how the water came to be contaminated.

The Sierra Club alleges that the San Juan Coal Company has improperly dumped more than 40 million tons of coal ash and sludge into unlined pits, resulting in the contamination of waterways and wells near the mine.

The group says that the waste, and the contaminated water, pose a danger to livestock, wildlife and families in the area, and in early December, the Sierra Club announced that it intends to sue the owners of the San Juan Coal Company.

The company denies responsibility for the contamination.

“San Juan Coal Company is confident that allegations of water contamination as a result of coal combustion by-product (CCB ) placement at the San Juan Mine are incorrect and are not supported by water monitoring data,” Charles Roybal, senior counsel for the coal company’s parent company, BHP Billiton, told The Independent in an email.

Just after the spill, attention focused on storage of wet coal sludge near rivers, and recommendations that risk be minimized by “putting dry ash into landfills with caps, linings and collection systems for contaminated water,” as the New York Times noted.

The disposal of combustion waste is currently unregulated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, but that may soon change. The EPA has been working to develop a regulatory framework for coal ash disposal since the Tennessee spill, and is expected to issue new disposal rules in early 2010.

At issue: Unlined pits

San Juan Coal Company disposes of the waste from the San Juan Generating Plant in unlined pits at the San Juan coal mine, which is allowed under current state regulations. There are three wells in place to monitor the groundwater in the area.

According to the Sierra Club’s notice of intent to sue, coal waste has been used to fill pits upgrade of “well L” and adjacent to “well D.” Both wells were placed by the coal company to monitor the water going into the Shumway and Westwater arroyos, which exit the mine boundaries and travel downstream.

A representative of BHP Billiton said the monitoring program has been in place for over 30 years, and that data from the wells is given to the state’s Mining and Mineral Division and subsequently made available to the public on a quarterly basis.

According to the data supplied in the Sierra Club’s notice of intent to sue, there are excessive levels of boron and selenium in water from Well D, and selenium, chloride and sulfate from Well L. The environmental group says it will present additional data in its suit concerning other pollutants, like uranium, arsenic, and lead.

“The only possible cause of the increasing pollutant concentrations in ground water drawn from Well L is leaching of pollutants from CCW [coal combustion waste], followed by transport off the permit area either by ground water movement, diffusion, or both,” the group states on page 15 of the notice.

Brancard agrees with the group’s analysis of the water data itself, but says the cause of the pollution isn’t necessarily the disposal of the coal ash in the unlined pits at the San Juan mine.

“The data they have is our data,” he said, “and there are some levels [of pollutants] that go beyond state standards. But it’s unclear what the source of the pollution is.”

The culprit could be a number of things, Brancard told the Independent.

But Jeff Stant, the director of the Environmental Integrity Project and a consultant with the Sierra Club, said that both geography in the area and the preponderance of one metal in particular—boron–makes it clear where the contamination comes from.

The geography places the monitoring wells lower than the waste pits at the San Juan mine with coal ash and “scrubber sludge,” he said.

Of three monitoring wells, one is close to the power plant and coal ash pits, while the other two are six to eight miles from the power plant. The power plant is in a location that wouldn’t be able to intercept the flow of water in a way that would lead to the kind of contamination that exists at those two wells, he said.

“[Due to this geography] the idea that the power plant causes the leaching of the metals into the water is crazy,” he said.

That assessment, in conjunction with high levels of metals like boron, leads Stant to believe that the contamination is due to coal waste disposal back at the mine, not the power plant itself.

“Boron is a very good signifier of coal combustion waste leaching,” he said. “If you look at ash sites throughout the country where there is water contamination, you’ll see high levels of boron.”

New Mexico groundwater quality standards call for no more than 0.75 milligrams of boron per liter of water. The data shows boron well over that standard consistently present in the water going back to 1979, typically ranging from 1.3 to 2 milligrams per liter.

“We feel strongly there is no other way to explain the contamination,” Stant continued.

Read...
http://newmexicoindependent.com/43620/environmental-group-plans-to-sue-over-coal-ash-at-san-juan-mine

Wednesday, November 18, 2009

New Mexico compared to Chernobyl–in an art review


Cowa on uranium tailings in New Mexico

Comment:  Is this history repenting itself with uranium mining, keep the ban on uranium mining!
By Marjorie Childress
11/17/09 10:55 AM

“Ground Zero. In some ways, New Mexico comes a close second to Chernobyl.”

So begins a review, published this week in the Akron Beacon Journal, of an exhibit of photographs of Patrick Nagatani. The New Mexico photographer’s work is on display at the Akron Art Museum for the next few months, in an exhibition titled “Nuclear Enchantment.”

Nagatani’s work is “…all about questioning society’s blind faith in the so-called experts, in particular the expertise of science.” Nagatani’s work not only questions that faith but ridicules it, the piece states.

It then labels the New Mexico moniker “Land of Enchantment” as more accurately our “Better Business Bureau nickname.”

Known by its Better Business Bureau nickname as ”Land of Enchantment,” New Mexico is also the birthplace of the nuclear age. It has sites linked to research and development, weapon stockpiles, uranium mines, test sites and reactors alarmingly close not only to large population areas, but also to the tribal lands of the Hopi and Pueblo Indians, the oldest continuous culture in our country.

While the piece doesn’t show the actual pictures, it has great descriptions of the work. Here’s an example:

Uranium Tailings, Anaconda Minerals Corporation, Laguna Pueblo Reservation, New Mexico is a 1990 lifocolor print that illustrates a common misconception.

”If you’re on the right side of a Southwest Airlines 737 heading west and look down [if you're not over the wing],” Nagatani noted, ”you see beautiful white deposits below that make a striking contrast with the gray-brown landscape.

”I have to laugh to myself when I hear people around me admiring these ‘natural’ formations. They’re uranium tailings deposits, acres and acres of them.

”They’re all hot, they’re all radioactive.” And they’re mostly on the Laguna Pueblo Reservation, believed to have been settled in 1699.

Various academic and individual scientific studies combined with oral histories and community based assessments over the years don’t make the comparison to Chernobyl a stretch.

A contentious debate over the future of uranium mining in New Mexico is currently underway. The Navajo Nation in 2005 banned uranium mining on its land, but mining companies are pursuing the development of new mines on the public and private land that snakes into and around Navajo land due to an expectation that a new uranium boom is looming.

Click Title or Link to whole:
http://newmexicoindependent.com/41851/new-mexico-compared-to-chernobyl-in-an-art-review

Tuesday, November 17, 2009

Uranium Companies Moving Forward As Old Mines Are Cleaned Up

By Kathy Helms
Dine Bureau
Gallup Independent

WINDOW ROCK – New Mexico Mining and Minerals Division has approved Uranium Resources Inc.'s request for renewal of an exploration permit application in the Ambrosia Lake District and also has approved cleanup plans for two closed mines.

The permit for URI's Section 13 in-situ exploration project near Grants, originally approved in November 2008, allows URI to drill up to 10 holes for the purpose of extracting core samples to evaluate the suitability of the property for in-situ recovery of uranium. URI owns the Section 13 property in fee and the permit renewal is now valid until November 2010.

“This permit renewal is important in that it will allow us to determine the suitability of whether a portion of our Ambrosia Lake reserves are amenable to ISR mining methods,” URI President and CEO Don Ewigleben stated in a press release.

URI’s Section 13 property is located in McKinley County, about 10 miles northeast of Grants. The property, along with three other parcels owned in fee by URI, hold the company’s Ambrosia Lake resources, estimated at 2.4 million pounds of uranium mineralized material.

The Mining and Minerals Division also approved reclamation plans for the Section 27 Mine, once operated by the United Nuclear Corp. of Gallup and JJ No. 1/L-Bar Mine, formerly operated by Sohio Western Mining Co., and now under the responsibility of Rio Tinto Energy of America in Salt Lake City.

Click Title or Link to whole post:
http://nativeunity.blogspot.com/2009/11/exploration-permit-request-clean-up.html