Showing posts with label Canada. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Canada. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 17, 2010

The impacts of uranium mining on indigenous communities.

Great Bear Lake, Canada (so pretty, what is wrong with people who want to destroy such a lovely place for mining?)

Comment:  Great article, please read about the same false truths that the Canadians tell about the benefits of uranium mining to their locals are the same false truths that the local uranium company are telling Virginia leaders and our people!  Demand our leaders to ban uranium mining and milling now!

 Posted by: joan.Russow on http://PEJ.org
Saturday, February 13, 2010 - 05:12 AM
Heather Tufts

The climate change debate positions nuclear power as a partial solution to carbon emissions according to some scientists and politicians. Uranium mining speculation lacks comprehensive health and safety regulations while the ethics of Canadian exported uranium, which can lead to depleted uranium used in zones of war, needs greater scrutiny.

Abandoned uranium mines and the subsequent hazards experienced in forgotten communities have also been virtually ignored in Canada leading to tragic, unmitigated circumstances.

The long-term negative impacts of uranium mining can be witnessed in the small, rural community of Déline (North West Territories) which has a Dené population of 800 people. They are located right on the shore of Sahtu (Great Bear Lake) about 300 miles north of Yellowknife. Great Bear Lake is considered to be one of the last great fresh water lakes in the world. This area on the north shore of Sahtu was the site of radium mining from 1934 to 1939, and then a uranium mine from 1943 to 1962.

During the mining era the Dené of Déline, mostly men worked as labourers and as coolies carrying gunny sacks of radioactive uranium ore and concentrates on the transportation route. Waste from both radium and uranium mines were dumped directly into the lake and used as landfill. Port Radium was owned and operated by a Canadian crown corporation but uranium ore and concentrates were extracted, milled and sold to the US Government for the Manhattan Project to build an atomic bomb during the Second World War.

Déline in the North West Territories.


The mine initially operated under the emergency regulations of the War Measures Act. No warnings were issued at the time about the hazardous and toxic nature of these ores and so people took no precautions regarding their drinking water or their traditional foods.

In 1975 young men from Déline were sent to work in the tunnels on a Government training program without masks for radon gas exposure. In 1997 ten young men were sent with only two hours of training to clean up "hot spots" of radioactive soil in Sawmill Bay without shower or decontamination facilities. Once again the Dené people of Déline were not informed of these hazardous exposures but recent information mean that they now live in constant fear of their contaminated land, water, animals with ongoing concerns about their health and survival.

Déline is known as the “village of widows’ because most of the men who worked as labourers in the mines have died of some form of cancer. The widows, who are traditional women, were left to raise their families without husbands and breadwinners. As a result they became dependent on welfare and relied on the young men who remained in the community to help supply them with their traditional foods. The women are struggling and the village is seeing the first generation of young men in the history of the Dené to grow up without the guidance and teachings of their grandfathers, fathers and uncles. This unfulfilled tradition threatens the cultural and spiritual survival of the only community on the Great Bear Lake.

In 1998 the Dené First Nation lobbied the federal government for compensation and mitigation. On September 6, 2005, Déline community members were given the disappointing findings of a five-year study to examine the health and environmental impacts of the government-owned radium and uranium mine which had operated for almost thirty years in Déline. Although the community had lost 15 former ore transport workers to cancer the report stated that the numbers of deaths were insufficient to prove unequivocally the link to the mine.

By not acknowledging the full health consequences of uranium mining the government offloads the responsibility to compensate or provide justice to the Dené First Nation. To date consultations with government are still underway with anticipated costs for remediation in the millions of dollars. An agreement about cause and affect has not yet been reached. In a related situation in Port Hope Ontario, NDP MP Nathan Cullen called for an investigation in 2007 into Health Canada’s denials of the health risks of uranium contamination with the accusation that profits are influencing policy. These issues remain unresolved in 2010 even though increased uranium mining is imminent in some Canadian provinces.

Uranium exploration near the world famous Thelon Game Sanctuary in Nunavut alarmed the Dené and Inuit communities who are dependent on the caribou herds that use the area for grazing and calving. The current land use plan for Kivalliq (Keewatin) has been in place since 2000 and prohibits uranium mining in the region until Nunavut’s environmental assessment process has reviewed all the related environmental and health impact issues. In contradiction to the local land use plan Nunavut’s Inuit land claims commission adopted a policy in favour of uranium mining returning the legacy of uncertainty to the area. Their policy framework provides the tenuous rationale that uranium mining and nuclear energy could mitigate some of the climate change impacts in the north.

The policy does not account for the quantifiable fossil fuel usage in uranium exploration nor resolves issues about the impacts of nuclear waste storage. They assert that environmental and health concerns related to uranium mining have been resolved but provide no supporting evidence.

Dissention rapidly gained momentum from the Inuit in Baker Lake and the Hunters and Trappers Association who demanded a moratorium on all mining exploration. The vehement opposition to the uranium mine proposal near the Thelon Game Sanctuary eventually led the Mackenzie Valley Environmental Impact Review Board to recommend rejection of uranium exploration at Screech Lake in 2009.

Uranium development in Saskatchewan dates back to the 1930s when the first discoveries were made in the far north. Since that time controversial uranium exploitation has undergone several waves of investment and although it contributes to the nuclear industry and is opposed by many NGOs there has been virtually no opposition from any political party in Canada. Today uranium is one of Canada’s leading exports with the highest percentage being mined in the province of Saskatchewan on indigenous lands.

The land is rich in uranium deposits but this hazardous mining industry poses a considerable threat to the natural ecology and the values of people who live on the land. At the heart of this issue is a system of indigenous beliefs and culture which regards them as inseparable from the land, the waters and the animals. The impact of mining on their ancestral lands where they are the traditional custodians contravenes their spiritual and cultural beliefs.

Inside a uranium mine.

Conversely emerging job opportunities in a struggling northern economy have out of necessity led to the partial cooperation of some native bands with uranium mining projects. In 1993 the La Ronge Indian Band gave their support to the Kitsaki uranium mining development at Rabbit Lake citing increased economic benefits for their community, with the caveat that environmental impacts were closely monitored.

Employment opportunities are short-term and hazardous but highly financed propaganda to promote the benefits of uranium mining to northerners potentially trumps aboriginal self-determined, sustainable, economic alternatives.

Harding also argues that the geopolitical uses and long-term environmental effects are being hidden, and outweigh the short-term economic gain by which communities and governments are sometimes wooed. He cites the Harper government’s eager acceptance of nuclear energy as evidence that Canada is going down a path of misplaced intentions.

However the environmental, health and social impacts of uranium development extraction on aboriginal communities in the Canadian North remain an urgent concern to many communities.

Mining activity has altered the landscape through the construction of roads, new settlements and the underground mine sites.

Ore extraction and processing have released dangerous chemicals into the air and water and in spite of the participation of the ABDLP there is still a predominance of non-native labour which has displaced and marginalized local indigenous people.

Primarily it is the large multinationals, not the local people who benefit from the multi-million dollar uranium mining industry in Saskatchewan and elsewhere.

In the United States Canadian uranium mining speculation has increased in spite of indigenous opposition and a long legacy of life-threatening damages on Navajo Reservations.

Barrick Gold of Canada which nets profits of over 1.5 billion dollars a year is active in uranium exploration in New Mexico but it has not committed sufficient funds to adequately address the contamination that has already destroyed four aquifers in Navajo territory.

The uranium industry is attempting to convince the public that it will bring high-paying jobs and tax money to the state by buying advertisements in local papers and other news media while paying industry representatives to testify at hearings.

Four years ago, the 2006 Indigenous World Uranium Summit held in Navajo territory in the U.S. issued the following powerful declaration: “We, the Peoples gathered at the Indigenous World Uranium Summit, at this critical time of intensifying nuclear threats to Mother Earth and all life, demand a worldwide ban on uranium mining, processing, enrichment, fuel use, and weapons testing and deployment, and nuclear waste dumping on native lands.”


More than 300 participants from 14 countries participated in the event, with a variety of topics including international efforts to halt uranium mining, and the devastating effects on health and culture. Indignation grew as they realized that American Indian uranium miners in both the United States and Canada (Saskatchewan and NWT) had been sent to their deaths to work in the uranium mines long after scientists warned of the health hazards of radon gas and radiation.

Canada is the world’s largest producer of uranium with about 60% exported to the United States.

 Many abandoned uranium mines have left behind a devastating legacy but the nuclear industry has re-branded itself as a viable solution to global warming. The profitable Canadian uranium mining industry lacks serious scrutiny; meanwhile remote indigenous communities are especially vulnerable to hazardous impacts thinly veiled as economic promise.


Read more:
http://www.pej.org/html/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=8041&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0

Tuesday, January 12, 2010

Uranium company ordered to clean up camp site


Comment:  So the Canadians are great miners, right!  No to uranium mining!
Last Updated: Tuesday, January 12, 2010
9:55 AM CT
3CBC News

Plans for uranium exploration have ground to a halt at a Nunavut property held by Uravan Minerals Inc.

Federal officials ordered Uravan to clean up a cache of materials from a mining camp site for which it did not have the proper land use permits.

The site in question is at Sand Lake, on Uravan's sprawling Garry Lake uranium exploration property, located 245 kilometres northwest of Baker Lake in Nunavut's Kivalliq region.

Not only did the company not have a permit to work on the Sand Lake site specifically, but the entire Garry Lake uranium property lies within the calving grounds of the Beverly caribou herd.

"One of our geologists was doing an inspection in the area and noticed that there was a bit of construction material, fuel drums, I believe a diamond drill as well," Bernie MacIsaac, Nunavut director of operations with the federal Indian and Northern Affairs Department, told CBC News.

Fuel spill found

A federal water licence inspector also visited Sand Lake in August and found about 1,000 litres of fuel had leaked onto the ground. Garbage was also found on at the site, according to a letter sent from the inspector to Uravan.

"That was one of the reasons why we issued that direction … because it was a threat to the environment," MacIsaac said of the discovered fuel spill.

But the Nunavut Impact Review Board recommended that Uravan complete an environmental impact statement for their exploration work.

Little support

Having to complete an environmental impact statement is unusual and costly to the company involved, but concerns were raised about the impact of Uravan's work on caribou in the area.

As a result, the land-use permits that Uravan needed could not be approved until they met the Nunavut Impact Review Board's requirements.

But Uravan may be pulling out of its Garry Lake project altogether: Lahusen said there has been little support for it, and the company's desire is to withdraw and focus elsewhere.

Read more:
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/north/story/2010/01/12/uravan-sand-lake.html

Wednesday, January 6, 2010

Nine out of Ten are Opposed to Uranium Exploration in Sept-Iles

Comment:  Ban uranium mining everywhere!

Tuesday, January 5, 2010
NICOLAS DUPONT, Actualité
January 4, 2010

Nine out of ten residents of Sept-Iles are opposed to uranium exploration in the area of the municipality. Those are the results of an opinion poll commissioned by the City.

The City of Sept-Iles today disclosed the results of the survey conducted by Léger Marketing which asked town residents their views about uranium exploration and mining.

“Now that the results have been tabulated” said the Mayor of Sept-Iles, Serge Lévesque, “Minister [of Natural Resources] Simard has everything he needs to take a decision.

He has stated that there will be no project if the citizens of Sept-Iles do not want it. He now knows what the people want.”

Read more at:
http://no-uranium.blogspot.com/2010/01/nine-out-of-ten-are-opposed-to-uranium.html

Thursday, December 31, 2009

N.B. uranium activity slow in 2009 (Canada)

Comment: Look at the following comment: "The regulations, which followed months of public debate and protest, banned uranium exploration from all municipalities, watersheds and near private wells"! So is this a fact that “uranium exploration" does pollute and damage our watersheds and wells according to this article! Attention Pittsylvania county leaders, are you going to trust a junior Canadian uranium corporation telling you that "uranium exploration" is safe? We know some wells around the drill holes in our county did damage some of our wells with lead! According to the article, this is proof that "uranium exploration" has ruined our wells! So the department that said the water is safe, are they telling us the truth or protecting the local Canadian uranium corporation? No to uranium mining and milling!

Published Thursday December 31st, 2009
By Cole Hobson
Times & Transcript Staff

It was a quiet year for New Brunswick uranium exploration and mining in 2009.

The uranium furor was front page news and caused widespread community uproar in 2008, but the issue has now seemingly been pushed to the back of people's minds, in large part due to a lack of activity in the province.

"Currently there are a handful of companies that have claims, however only one of them is actively doing any work," said Matt Jones, a communications officer for the Department of Natural Resources.

The Department of Natural Resources spokesperson said that one of the primary reasons uranium exploration has died off and companies have pulled out of the province is due to poor market conditions.

"What happened basically was I think for some of them it was just simply a matter of economics. Whereas in 2007 the price of uranium was as high as $140 per pound, after the recent economic downturn, prices are about $46 a pound," Jones said. "That's one of the main determining factors in decreased interest in uranium exploration."

Of course, regulations introduced by the provincial government in July 2008 also greatly limited the freedom of mining companies, causing companies like Toronto-based Sparton and Vale Inco to pull out of New Brunswick.

The regulations, which followed months of public debate and protest, banned uranium exploration from all municipalities, watersheds and near private wells.

The government also announced a buffer zone of 300 metres around any residences or institutional building where companies would not be able to stake claims.

Of course, there are still those who oppose uranium mining even after the new regulations and who continue to be staunchly against any activity at all in the province.

Kent South Conservative MLA Claude Williams said in a February 2009 interview that citizens were still concerned.

"There is still the same level of concern today as there was one year ago," Williams said. "People are just as vigilant."

In May, New Brunswick PC leader David Alward again called for an outright ban on uranium mining in the province and presented a petition to legislature, which was signed by 597 students who were also in favour of a ban.

In recent months, however, the issue has seemingly fallen out of both the mainstream public and political conscience.

Jones said that while uranium activity has all but dried up in the province, New Brunswick is still open for business for any companies that want to explore within the province's regulations.

Read...
http://timestranscript.canadaeast.com/news/article/905694

Monday, December 14, 2009

Sept-Îles residents protest uranium exploration

Comment:  No to uranium mining!

Protesters back doctors who threaten to quit region

Last Updated: Monday, December 14, 2009 | 6:41 AM ET
The Canadian Press

Sept-Îles residents continue to pressure Quebec to slap a moratorium on uranium exploration in the province, despite the government's promise to open a debate on health and safety concerns surrounding the industry.

Hundreds of protesters gathered Sunday in Sept-Îles to protest uranium exploration in Quebec.

Some 1,000 protesters gathered Sunday in the town about 900 kilometres northeast of Montreal on the North Shore.

They were backing 20 doctors who threatened to quit their practice in the remote Quebec region because of uranium exploration nearby.

"We're showing our support," said Marc Fafard, spokesman and founder of a grassroots group opposed to uranium mining in the province.

"We want to show how proud we are of the doctors to have finally made this a provincial debate. Like it should be."

The province's head of public health, Dr. Alain Poirier, met with the doctors last week.

Poirier later announced Quebec would create a special committee to study the potential risks of uranium exploration and mining on health and safety.

Read more:
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/montreal/story/2009/12/14/quebec-uranium-cp.html

Sunday, December 13, 2009

Quebec Uranium Moratorium Called For in Sept-Îles




Comment: This blog would like a referendum on uranium mining with Pittsylvania County and Danville, VA leaders! We would like to be on neutral settings and not the county meetings where the supervisors loom about us like the kings of England’s use to do with her colonists! All communities in the world are fighting against uranium mining and milling!

Wednesday, December 9, 2009

The citizens in Sept-Îles are demanding the government of Quebec hold a referendum on uranium exploitation in Quebec.

It would be the democratic way to resolve this intractable problem (uranium mining).

Sept-Îles Sans Uranium is organizing a march in their community on Sunday (Dec. 13) aimed at forcing the Quebec government to hold a debate on the health and safety concerns surrounding uranium mining.

More:
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/industry-news/energy-and-resources/protesters-seek-debate-on-uranium-mining/article1393708/
Read more at:
http://no-uranium.blogspot.com/2009_12_01_archive.html

Wednesday, December 2, 2009

Court Victory Forces Canada to Report Pollution Data for Mines


Comment:  So Canada did not have to tell their people about problems with tailing ponds but was force to report problems after losing a lawsuit.  Canadian uranium mining corporations are coming south to mine uranium in Virginia and out west!  Will they report problems to the EPA or NRC, don't think so!  No to uranium mining and milling!
Apr 24 2009

TORONTO – Great Lakes United, MiningWatch Canada and Ecojustice are hailing a landmark decision from the Federal Court of Canada released late yesterday that will force the federal government to stop withholding data on one of Canada’s largest sources of pollution – millions of tonnes of toxic mine tailings and waste rock from mining operations throughout the country.

The Federal Court sided with the groups and issued an Order demanding that the federal government immediately begin publicly reporting mining pollution data from 2006 onward to the National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI). The strongly worded decision describes the government’s pace as “glacial” and chastises the government for turning a “blind eye” to the issue and dragging its feet for “more than 16 years”.

“This is a huge decision for environmental justice in Canada,” said Ecojustice lawyer Justin Duncan. Fellow lawyer Marlene Cashin added, “The court has unequivocally upheld the right of Canadians to know when the health of their communities and the environment is under threat from one of the country’s largest sources of toxic pollution.”

The lawsuit was filed in Federal Court in 2007 on behalf of MiningWatch Canada and Great Lakes United by Ecojustice (formerly Sierra Legal Defence Fund). The lawsuit alleged that the Minister of Environment broke the law when he failed to collect and report this pollution information from mines in Canada under the NPRI.

“This is a victory that should be celebrated from Smithers to Voisey’s Bay,” said MiningWatch Canada spokesman Jamie Kneen. “The public has a right to know what kind of toxic liabilities are being created every day. It’s always been bizarre to us that the mining industry should not face the same reporting requirements as every other industrial sector, and we’re pleased that the Court agreed with us.”

In stark contrast, since 1998, the U.S. government has required mining companies to report all pollutants under the American equivalent of the NPRI, the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI). In 2005, the 72 mines reporting to the TRI released more than 500 million kilograms of mine tailings and waste rock – accounting for 27% of all U.S. pollutants reported. With yesterday’s court decision, pollution data from Canada’s 80 metal mining facilities will now similarly have to be reported under the NPRI.

“With this decision, the blindfold comes off and citizens can truly hold these companies to account for their pollution and the environmental and health dangers they pose.”

For further information please visit www.ecojustice.ca or contact:
Justin Duncan, Ecojustice (416) 573-4258 (cell)
Marlene Cashin, Ecojustice (416) 368-7533 ext. 31
John Jackson, Great Lakes United (519) 744-7503
Jamie Kneen, MiningWatch Canada (613) 761-2273 (cell)

Read more at:
http://www.miningwatch.ca/en/court-victory-forces-canada-report-pollution-data-mines

Canada's toxic mine tailings secret goes to court

Comment:  Another myth that modern uranium mining is safe!

Information on toxic pollution from mines being hidden from public
Submitted by Jode Roberts — Feb 25, 2009 11:20 AM
Information on toxic pollution from mines being hidden from public [January 19, 2009]

TORONTO Jan 19, 2009

Canada's Federal Court will be hearing a lawsuit today against the Minister of the Environment for failing to ensure that Canada's mining industry publicly reports the hundreds of millions of kilograms of toxic pollution it generates each year.

The lawsuit was filed in Federal Court in late 2007 by Ecojustice (formerly Sierra Legal Defence Fund) on behalf of MiningWatch Canada and Great Lakes United. The Application for Judicial review alleges that the Minister broke the law when he directed mining companies to not report huge amounts of pollution sent to tailings ponds and waste rock piles to the National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI).

"We are arguing that the Minister has ignored his legal duties under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act to provide the public with the full extent of pollutants released by mining companies in Canada," said Justin Duncan, Staff Lawyer with Ecojustice. "The Canadian public - and especially residents living downstream from mining operations - have the right to scrutinize the environmental and health hazards these mining companies continue to create"

Pollution in the form of mine tailings and waste rock - the data being withheld from the Canadian public - accounted for more than 97% of the total pollutants reported by the U.S. mining industry.

"Given the enormous amounts of carcinogens and heavy metals like lead and mercury reported in U.S. mine tailings, it is absurd that Canadian mines are being let off the hook and not reporting this massive form of toxic pollution," said MiningWatch Canada spokesman Jamie Kneen. "Whether you live in Smithers, British Columbia, Voisey's Bay, Newfoundland and Labrador, or anywhere in between, Canadians have a right to know what poisons industry is releasing into our air, water, and soil."

For further information please contact:

Justin Duncan or Marlene Cashin, Ecojustice (416) 368-7533 ext.22 or ext. 31 John Jackson, Great Lakes United, (519) 744-7503 or 519-591-7503 (cell) Jamie Kneen, MiningWatch Canada (613) 569-3439

Read more at:
http://www.ecojustice.ca/media-centre/press-releases/canadas-toxic-mine-tailings-secret-goes-to-court/

Tuesday, November 24, 2009

Canadian mining firms face abuse allegations




Comment: The Canadian's mining corporations are invading America and have threatened the state of Colorado with threats about CO mining laws. The Canadians will be invading Virginia to mine uranium. Does Virginians want this type of Corporations, Heck NO!!! Write the state and local leaders to ban uranium mining now!(thanks KM)

Published On Sun Nov 22 2009

A private member's bill aims to impose controls on powerful Canadian mining companies that operate overseas

Canadian mining companies are facing allegations of abuse and assault on local citizens in dozens of developing nations.

The companies say they have done nothing wrong – mining copper, gold and other metals brings only prosperity to these poor regions.

Yet locals in countries like Ecuador allege some companies have used armed guards to violently trample their opposition to mines that threaten rainforests and their way of life.

The word "Canada" is so reviled in some places that travelling Canadians mask their citizenship by wearing American flags on their caps and backpacks.

In Ottawa this week, at a House of Commons committee, MPs will continue debating a Liberal private member's bill designed to put controls on mining companies overseas.

THE ALLEGATIONS are severe: From Ecuador comes a lawsuit, filed in Ontario, alleging that in 2006 a Canadian company's armed security forces attacked unarmed locals with pepper spray first, then fired guns to dampen protest near a proposed mining site.

In El Salvador, allegations of violent attacks against anti-mining activists. In Mexico, allegations of human rights and environmental abuse that led a Mexican court to close a Canadian-owned mine.

While MPs in Canada consider controls, foreign pension funds have signalled they will not invest in Canadian mining companies unless they adopt firm corporate responsibility rules abroad.

International Trade Minister Stockwell Day says there will be no legislative action because it would not work, and the companies do not need it.

"As you know, one country doesn't develop laws that apply in another country," he said in an interview.

The allegations of human rights abuses come from at least 30 of the world's poorest countries and have named companies of all sizes, from giant corporations to junior mining companies.

Company spokesmen at some firms say they are the target of false allegations that stem from poorly run or corrupt governments where mines are located.

"The biggest challenge out there is a lack of governance capacity in developing countries," says Gordon Peeling, CEO of the Mining Association of Canada, which represents the interests of Canada's largest mining companies.

"If (countries) had the capacity to protect civil rights and live up (to) their international obligations with appropriate justice systems, etc. we wouldn't have much to talk about."

Forty-three per cent of the mining exploration around the world can be attributed to Canadian mining companies.

"In many countries, when foreign investors arrive, it happens too often that local, even national governments will wash their hands of these regions," says Louise Léger, director general of Foreign Affairs Canada's Trade Commissioner Service.

"In other words a company wants to invest, and all of a sudden it becomes responsible for building schools, roads, setting up health-care services, and providing basic services that all governments must ensure their citizens."

But watchdog groups like MiningWatch Canada and the Halifax Initiative, both based in Ottawa, allege some companies spend money buying guns, employing paramilitaries, bribing officials and forcefully relocating entire communities.

Allegations like these caused John McKay, Liberal MP for Scarborough-Guildwood, to introduce the private member's bill being debated in committee.

"Not only is there a behavioural risk to an individual company, but there is also a risk to our national reputation."

POLITICIANS HAVE long squabbled over how best to deal with the accusations of abuse.

Debate kicked up in 2002 after a United Nations report called on the Canadian government to investigate the actions of seven Canadian companies accused of illegally exploiting resources from the Democratic Republic of the Congo, which has been in a state of civil war since 1996.

The Canadian government didn't investigate.

Then in 2004 came reports of bloodshed.

From Africa: Where the UN says 73 people were killed in Kilwa, a fishing town in the Congo. Killed, according to a UN report, by the Congolese military, which used vehicles, supplies, pilots and drivers from a Canadian-Australian mining company to transport them to the site of the massacre.
To Southeast Asia: Where 15 Canadian-employed mine workers were gunned down in a remote Philippine jungle strip, victims of a feud between Canada's TVI Pacific Inc. and the indigenous peoples of Mindanao.

The committee called for an investigation. The Liberal government at the time responded, saying it recognized "the difficulties Canadian companies can face when operating in foreign jurisdictions" and said the TVI case "highlights the complexities of evaluating company activities against standards that may be either unclear or inconsistent between governments."

Again, the government didn't investigate.

MININGWATCH CANADA and the Halifax Initiative, both roundtable signatories, have criticized Day's response to the recommendations.

But Day says: "They need to get a real look at what is going on. They need to see the high quality of work that Canadian companies do and how they respect host governments and local communities."

Richard Janda, a law professor at McGill University and co-author of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Legal Analysis, says Day's initiatives are weak and disregard the severity of the allegations.

He also questions Day's appointment of Marketa Evans as Canada's first corporate social responsibility counsellor, a recently appointed bureaucrat who answers to Day and who is the closest thing to an ombudsman the Harper government has produced.

He says Evans' position is "toothless" because, under the mandate given to her by Day, she requires consent from a mining company before she can review any allegations against that company.

The Conservatives have vowed to kill it and McKay says some Liberals are weary of attaching themselves to a bill opposed by some of the richest companies in the country. "The mining industry in Canada is too powerful a lobby," McKay says.


But he won't say much else.


"I have to be extremely careful because the mining companies have made it very plain to me that, `We will sue your ass off if, in fact, you make any allegation of our companies and cause reputational damage.'


"But I will say, if they think they can treat a Canadian MP this way, you can imagine what they say about Third World countries where they can walk in and say, `How much to buy you?'"
Click Title or Link to whole:
http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/article/729147--one-man-s-defence-of-a-national-reputation

Wednesday, November 18, 2009

Uranium mining company protests proposed regulations, public input




Comment: Tell these greedy and ugly Uranium Mining Canadian Carpetbaggers to get out of American and that means Virginia too!

By Associated Press

12:45 PM MST, November 18, 2009

DENVER (AP) — A company that wants to mine uranium in Weld County claims that proposed state rules on protecting groundwater might be illegal.

Powertech USA also questions the legality of allowing public comment on setting rules such issues as groundwater quality and mine reclamation. The company argues the proposed rules are too broad.

Information from: Fort Collins Coloradoan, http://www.coloradoan.com

Click Title or Link to whole post:
http://www.2thedeuce.com/news/sns-ap-co--uraniummining-rules,0,6964323.story

Tuesday, August 25, 2009

A uranium hole in the heart

Comment: Lots of good points about the problem of so call "Modern Uranium Mining"! Virginia considering uranium mining all over Virginia is just crazy! Plus have the Canadians doing the mining, they are problems with their own uranium mines! Demand the State of Virginia to ban Uranium Mining and Milling now!


August 24, 2009 by Christina MacPherson
A uranium hole in the heart
Green Left Daniel Clarke, Alice Springs 23 August 2009

Canadian company Cameco and Australian-owned Paladin, the two businesses involved in the joint venture, hope to build Australia’s fifth uranium mine — well inside the Alice Springs water catchment boundary.

In July, environment minister Peter Garrett approved the nation’s fourth uranium mine at the Four Mile site in South Australia. The Angela Pamela exploratory licence is part of the NT’s push to expand its mining industry in response to a global surge in demand for uranium.

But a growing chorus of Alice Springs residents and tourism operators say the health risks of a uranium mine outweigh any economic benefits.

Family and medical groups have expressed grave concerns about Cameco’s recent history of radioactive leaks and flooding accidents in its uranium mines.


If built, the Angela Pamela uranium mine will be less than 15 kilometres away from existing and proposed bore fields for the Alice Springs’ drinking water.

Cameco, the world’s largest producer of uranium, flooded its Cigar Lake mine in Canada in 2006, leaving the world’s single largest uranium deposit underwater. Efforts to remove the water have so far failed.

In 2007, the company detected a radioactive leak at its Port Hope conversion plant. A similar leak was uncovered in 2001. Last year it paid US$1.4 million to the US state of Wyoming for failing to comply with a host of environmental standards at its Smith Ranch-Highland facility.
…………. Arid Lands Environment Centre coordinator Jimmy Cocking ..”“Both the nuclear industry and the government are relying on the fact that because we’re so far away from the big cities this issue will be out of sight, out of mind.

“If this is allowed to happen a lot of families will leave the town and we need to stop this now before exploration is finished and a full mining application is submitted.

“Who really wants to go to a place where if the wind blows up from the south — like it does here almost every day — there’s a possibility that you’re breathing in radioactive dust?”…………………..

Beyond Nuclear Initiative campaigner Nat Wasley said it was “ludicrous” for the federal and territory governments to use the Ranger uranium mine as an example of good practice.

“The Commonwealth’s own scientist revealed in March that 100,000 litres of contaminated water is leaking from the [Ranger] mine into the ground beneath Kakadu every day”, she told GLW.

“If those are the problems they’re having at the most heavily regulated uranium mine in Australia, if not the world, one can only imagine what might happen down the track at Alice Springs.”

Green Left – A uranium hole in the heart

http://uranium-news.com/

Friday, July 10, 2009

Powertech touts uranium mine advantages, C.A.R.D. argues contrary

NUNN — There were 140 folding chairs furnished for spectators in the old gymnasium, but about 200 people attended a head-to-head debate Wednesday at the Nunn Community Center between authorities from a uranium mining company and representatives from a group opposing a mining project near Nunn.

Officials of Vancouver, Canada-based Powertech Uranium Corp. attempted to reassure residents of Nunn and surrounding areas that the proposed operation of placing uranium mines a few miles west of Nunn would not only bring economic benefits, but would bring no negative water contamination or health problems.

Coloradoans Against Resource Destruction argued the contrary. A number of members of the audience seemed to side with C.A.R.D.

Victor Elder, who has a well two miles east of one of the proposed mining areas, said his main worry is the quality of well water.

“It is a definite concern,” he said.

Still, there were several mine supporters as well.

John D. Nelson, who lives within a mile of the proposed mine site — between Nunn, Wellington and Carr — said he has worked more than 30 years in the uranium mine industry. He said he hopes the mine application is approved because of the tax revenue it will bring to Nunn, improving roads and services.

Though most of the people in attendance seemed to have their minds made up before the debate, Nelson said he'll continue to advocate acceptance of the mine, saying he'll “try to talk some sense into people.”

After each side conducted a 20-minute presentation, moderator Jeff Boulter had to temporarily halt the debate because several audience members audibly voiced opinions while Powertech and C.A.R.D. representatives took prepared questions.

The debate, including presentations, lasted more than three hours.

Representing Powertech were chairman and COO Wallace Mays and president and CEO Dick Clement.

Mays and Clement noted Powertech's track record and economic benefits as reasons to support building the mine in northern Colorado.

In C.A.R.D.'s corner were civil engineer Jay Davis, attorney Jeff Parsons and medical doctor Michael Paddock, who cited, among many reasons, the risk of contamination as the main factor for disapproving the mine.

“We cannot afford to take the chance, that once the gate is open, it cannot be closed,” Paddock said. “We cannot afford to experiment here.”

Thursday, June 25, 2009

Quebec Auditor General Agrees - Mining Companies Short Change Taxpayers

Comment: Everybody all over the world are fighting uranium mining!! Demand Virginia to ban uranium mining and milling!

Thursday, June 25, 2009

Quebec Auditor General Agrees - Mining Companies Short Change Taxpayers
Further to my recent post on how one exploration company active in Quebec and BC last year walked away with $600K in taxpayer money, Quebec's Auditor General confirmed last April a number of facts about the impact of the mining industry in Quebec.

Some astonishing information:

between 2002 and 2008, 14 of the 24 mining companies operating in Quebec paid zero royalties (in the same period, the annual output of Quebec’s mining sector was $4.2 billion)
during that timeframe an average of 1.5 per cent of the gross value of Quebec’s mines was paid in royalties
the industry paid $109 million for environmental remediation, while the actual costs of cleaning up abandoned mine sites was $352 million, leaving Quebec to pick up 69 per cent of the tab, or $243 million
file reviews by the Auditor General revealed no trace of collaboration between the department of natural resources and wildlife and the department of sustainable development, environment and parks
the objective of the Quebec government's encouragement and financial subsidies to the mining industry is job creation yet the employment in Quebec’s mining sector actually dropped by 17 per cent in the last 10 years
Quebec is a bonanza for investors who get back in tax credits $716 for every $1,000 they invest in a mining company
Quebec mines do not respect the three elements of sustainable development: projects must be economically sound, environmentally and socially acceptable to those living nearby
In the National Assembly, junior minister Simard said the Charest government would introduce “very soon” a new mining strategy with three priorities: wealth creation, respect for the environment and developing mines with the local population.

This is the same mineral strategy that was announced but not delivered back in October 2007. Reportedly it is being released on Monday, June 29, 2009 and will be followed by "consultations" this summer and new legislation in the fall.

We'll see.

Asked for its reaction to the auditor general’s findings by the Montreal Gazette, the Mining Association of Canada did not return phone calls.

Given the circumstances and the general stresses in the Quebec economy, why should, I ask again, taxpayers be subsidizing investors in this sector? What is the "return on investment"? If jobs are being lost and companies are dumping the majority of their remediation costs back onto the average citizen while taking profits out of the province (in many cases) who is protecting the Quebec citizen?

The long overdue Mineral Strategy has a lot to answer for.

See the article in the Montreal Gazette: http://www.montrealgazette.com/news/Quebec+shortchanged+minerals+auditor+general/1470442/story.html

http://no-uranium.blogspot.com/2009/06/quebec-auditor-general-agrees-mining.html

Wednesday, June 17, 2009

Sask. forest fire burns near major uranium facility

Comment: Scary, a burning uranium mill would cause huge evacuations in Virginia, and ruin the water, air, and land forever!

Last Updated: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 10:53 AM CT

A large forest fire is burning in northern Saskatchewan about six kilometres away from a major uranium milling site.

The provincial fire centre has named the 100-hectare blaze, about 570 kilometres north of Saskatoon, the "High Rock" fire.

It's near the Key Lake operation, the largest uranium milling operation in the world, according to majority owner Cameco Corp.

The company is taking steps to reduce risks, Cameco spokesman Gord Struthers said.

"We've set out some sprinklers as a precaution, and are using some heavy equipment to cut some fire breaks and are working in co-operation with the Ministry of Environment people, who have a crew up working in the area," he said.

The mine camp is safe for now, he said. The number of people working at the camp wasn't immediately available.

"The prevailing winds are away from the camp, and it's also behind a chain of lakes, and apparently they were getting some rain up there as well," Struthers said.

On Tuesday, 75 forest fires were burning in the province. There have been 375 to date this year, compared with 327 by the same time last year.

Saturday, June 6, 2009

Why is someone drilling in my backyard?


Comment: Well, Virginia uranium mining will open the door to mineral rights and the right of Virginia to take the rights!! Demand your local leaders to ban uranium mining and milling now!!
June 06, 2009
Peter Gorrie

The province claims it made peace with residents of cottage country when it made private property in Southern Ontario off-limits to prospectors.

Its new policy, announced this spring, "takes bold steps toward a modern, innovative Mining Act that would balance all of our respective interests, benefit Ontario communities and support a vibrant Ontario minerals industry," says mines minister Michael Gravelle.

But "nobody is happy," says Robin Simpson, a leader in the battle to stop uranium mining in Haliburton County, a couple of hours northeast of Toronto. "We were used so the minister could say there were proper consultations. They obviously weren't listening at all."

Many cottagers and full-time residents of Haliburton and, further east, Frontenac, are up in arms over companies trying to take advantage of renewed interest in nuclear power by reviving uranium mines that briefly operated a few decades ago.

Ontario's Mining Act lets prospectors stake claims, without seeking permission, on government Crown land and on private properties where the owners don't control the rights to minerals under the surface.

Claim holders are then free to conduct drilling and other exploration work, which usually entails bulldozing or blasting. It's illegal to attempt to stop them
.

The property owners, including many cottagers from the GTA, along with aboriginal groups in Frontenac, have campaigned effectively against potential mining developments.

For First Nations, the issue is treaty rights: Prospecting and exploration are happening on land they claim. Non-natives are concerned about their property rights, and the prospect of radioactive air and water pollution, as well as noise, from mines on Crown land near their homes and cottages.

The province announced recently aboriginal communities are to be consulted before further mining activity, and prospectors can no longer claim private land anywhere in southern Ontario. (There are also new measures for the Far North, equally flawed, which I'll write about in a future column.)

But aboriginal leaders complain the province could still impose mining on their traditional lands. And Simpson points out the new policy does nothing about mining on Crown land, viewed as the biggest threat to an area aiming to create a tourism economy.

On top of that, the province will still hold the mineral rights under private properties, and reserves the power to eventually allow mining on them.

"It's the same old, same old ... a big bloody sham," says Simpson, whose land has been partially staked for uranium exploration.

"It's a crock," says Steve Quebell, sawmill worker who lives with his wife and teenage daughter on 33 hectares of forested land in Haliburton that's been claimed by a company planning to mine nepheline, a relatively rare mineral used in glass and paint.

The ministry is backing the claim, despite evidence, says Quebell, that it wasn't staked properly and that holes were drilled too close to a stream. The exploration crew bulldozed 500 square metres of trees and soil for one of the six holes it drilled.

On the larger front, having seen their original demands ignored, the cottage-country residents will now campaign for a prohibition against any mining on Crown land in southern Ontario.

Their efforts include pressuring members of the Legislature, many of them Liberals, who represent cottagers' home ridings.

Mining in southern Ontario accounts for only one per cent of the industry's spending in the province. The companies involved are minor players, and most of their projects will amount to nothing.

As staking and exploration expand in prime vacation areas (there's also been activity in the Parry Sound area), the government appears to be creating a lot of trouble for itself for little benefit.

Peter Gorrie is the Star's former environment reporter. He can be reached at: pgorrie@sympatico.ca

http://www.thestar.com/printArticle/645838

Friday, June 5, 2009

Canada's Uranium Mining

Comment: I thought this is a great article since it is Canada who is trying to mine uranium in Virginia!!!

Thursday, 04 June 2009
Anna Tilman

The Yellowcake Trail tracks all aspects of uranium in Canada from the mining and milling, to processing and use, throughout its eighty-year history. The story begins with the history of uranium in Canada, from its initial discovery to the rapid development of mines that placed Canada as the prominent world leader in uranium production. Each mine has a story and each story has a common thread and legacy.

Fatal Attraction
Yellowcake is the bright yellow uranium powder produced when raw uranium ore is crushed and purified. It is actually a mixture of uranium oxides, mostly U3O8 (urania), and ranges in colour from yellow to orange to dark green. It is this yellowcake that is packaged in steel drums, traded and sent across the world to be further processed, converted to different forms, enriched and used in the manufacture of nuclear fuel or bombs.

The Yellowcake Trail is lined with environmental devastation, sickness and death. The nuclear industry has always been a law unto itself, sheltered by governments promoting the industry as a safe and clean means of satisfying the insatiable demand for energy. Yet no insurance company in the world will sell liability insurance to a nuclear power plant. Nuclear scientists and engineers strongly endorse nuclear power, caught up in their fascination with the unique properties of uranium and the power it unleashes.

Nuclear (radioactive) waste is deadly to human beings in amounts as small as a millionth of a gram, and we have produced it in hundreds of thousands of tonnes. It is already leaking out of totally inadequate containment, not only from mine sites, refineries and nuclear power plants, but also from nuclear weapons programs. There is no way to get rid of it and it remains lethal for millions of years.

For decades, Canada has been the world’s largest producer of uranium, home to the richest ore deposits, the largest uranium mine in the world, and the largest publicly traded uranium mining company – CAMECO (Canadian Mining and Energy Corporation).

As Canadians, we need to understand the detrimental impacts of uranium mining, processing and use to our country and to the health and environment of communities affected by these operations. At every stage there is polluted air, land, and water, wreaking permanent destruction on the health and environment of communities – especially, native communities, their food sources, and their natural habitat.

Once exploration and mining starts, there is no end – the mines can be closed and abandoned as often is the case, but the radioactive tailings remain.

Early History of Uranium in Canada
Canada’s foray into uranium mining began in 1930, when a prospector for Eldorado Gold Mines discovered pitchblende, a uranium-bearing mineral, on the shores of Great Bear Lake in the Northwest Territories, about 450 kilometres north of Yellowknife. The ore body was one of the richest known uranium deposits in the world.

At that time, radium, a radioactive decay product of uranium, thought to be a miracle cure for cancer, commanded prices as high as $75,000 per ounce in the 1930s. Uranium itself was only incidental and of no economic interest. So in 1932, Eldorado built a radium refinery in Port Hope, Ontario, 5000 km away from Port Radium, the mine on Great Bear Lake.

It took about 74 tonnes of ore to yield little more than 3 grams of radium. Dene men from the local community of Déline, the only inhabited community on Great Bear Lake, were hired to carry cloth sacks of radioactive ore to the shipping sites. The community later became known as a “village of widows.”

By 1940, World War II was underway. The horrors of radium poisoning were revealed. The overheated and glutted radium market collapsed. All radium mines were closed, including Port Radium. German scientists had already discovered that uranium atoms can be split (fissioned), releasing vast amounts of energy. So uranium took centre stage in the world and acquired strategic importance.

In 1942, the federal government bought out all shares of Eldorado and established Eldorado Mining and Refining Limited as a Crown corporation with a national monopoly on prospecting, mining, and processing uranium. Port Radium was re-opened in 1942 in secrecy and was contracted to supply uranium to the US army for the “Manhattan” project to build the first atomic bomb and, after the war, to the US Atomic Energy Commission.

The Port Hope refinery played a critical role in all war activity. It was the only facility in North America for refining radioactive materials such as uranium. The huge piles of refinery residues dumped in the harbour and around the town provided an easy source of uranium. Along with the uranium sent from Port Radium, rich uranium concentrates from the Belgian Congo that had been secretly stockpiled in New York were refined at Port Hope.

The Port Radium mine was decommissioned in 1984, but a further clean-up of an estimated 1.7 million tonnes of radioactive mine tailings has only recently been ordered, after more than 60 years.

The Port Hope refinery continues to operate today as the oldest uranium refinery in the world.

Canada reigns supreme in production
• It has the world’s largest reserves of high-grade low-cost uranium.
• It has consistently been the world’s largest producer of natural uranium, producing about one-third to one-quarter of global production). Australia places a close second followed by Kazakhstan.
• 85% of Canada’s uranium yield is exported, primarily to United States, the European Union, and Japan. The remainder fuels the CANDU reactors in Canada.

The Postwar Cloak of Secrecy
When an industry develops as a result of war and military security, as the nuclear industry has, then it comes as no surprise that the industry is enveloped with secrecy, that the public is not being informed, and that governments coddle, protect and cover up for the industry.

It was the US-led development of the atomic bomb and the subsequent nuclear arms race in the 1940s that really resulted in the nuclear industry and uranium mining taking off. The US government sought a reliable supply of uranium for its nuclear weapons program; the Canadian federal government willingly assisted. Canada became the leading uranium exporter in the world.

The ban on private prospecting was lifted in 1947. By the early fifties, Canada was the scene of the most dramatic and widespread prospecting boom in its history. Thousands of radioactive strikes were reported.

By 1959, 23 mines with 19 treatment plants were in operation in Canada, spread across Saskatchewan, the Northwest Territories and Ontario. Some of these operations were small, others were huge. But they all share a common fate —a legacy of waste and contamination of waterways that continues to today.

Beaverlodge: During its lifetime from 1953 to 1982, the Eldorado mines at Beaverlodge, north of Lake Athabasca in the northwest corner of Saskatchewan, produced over 20,000 tonnes of yellowcake. The abandoned mines have yet to be reclaimed although there are currently proposals to carry out studies to this effect. Dam failures have been releasing tailings into Lake Athabasca.

Rayrock: The underground uranium mine, located 145 kilometres northwest of Yellowknife in the Northwest Territories, was operational for only two years, from 1957 to 1959, at which point it was abandoned by its owners.

During its operations, the mine yielded only 207 tonnes of uranium concentrate (yellowcake). Over 70,000 tonnes of radioactive tailings were “contained” in two basins, with the potential to leak metals, both radioactive and stable. The site also emits radon gas.

In the 1990s, the Department of Indian and Northern Affairs remediated the site, and it will be monitored once every 10 years for a further 100 years.

Bancroft: This area in Ontario, southeast of Algonquin Park, was the site of radium mining in the 1920s and 1930s, and went through two uranium booms from 1956 to 1964 and from 1976 to 1982. Its three underground mines, all of which were abandoned, produced about 6,700 tonnes of uranium oxide.

Elliot Lake: The "Uranium Capital" of the world, the Blind River-Elliot Lake area of Ontario had 12 uranium mines by 1960. All mining was underground at a depth of 170 to 950 metres. The low grade ore was plentiful. These mines accounted for about 80% of all uranium produced in Canada.

Within about twenty years of operation, more than 30 dams, built to contain uranium tailings, failed, dumping nuclear waste and chemical toxins into the Serpent River watershed that flows into Lake Huron.

By 1976, the entire Serpent River system including more than a dozen lakes, was badly contaminated for 80 kilometres or so downstream. The Serpent River system was identified by the International Joint Commission as the largest single contributor of radium contamination to the Great Lakes.

By 1996 when the mine finally closed, over 120,000 tonnes of yellowcake had been produced from the Elliot Lake mines, but over 170,000,000 tonnes of radioactive tailings are left behind.

Boom & Bust
The post-war phase of Canadian uranium production peaked in 1959 when more than 12,000 tonnes of uranium was produced. But as fast as it began, the boom came to an end when, in November 1959, the US Atomic Energy Commission decided to purchase all its supplies from US sources and not to renew any Canadian contracts.

Over the next few years the number of mines declined to four.

Uranium production in the Bancroft area and at Beaverlodge ceased in 1982 and the last of the Elliot Lake mines closed in 1996. The “nuclear” appetite had declined. Grassroots peace movements sprouted up around the globe, demanding some form of control and disarmament of nuclear weapons. The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), designed to limit the spread of nuclear weapons, came into force in 1970. Canada’s position, as expressed by then Prime Minister Pearson, was that no uranium from Canada would be used for weapons.

The Dawn of Nuclear Power
A new era for uranium developed in the latter part of 1960s, spurred on by the demand for electricity-generating nuclear power.

The first nuclear power plant in Canada, the Nuclear Power Demonstration Plant at Rolphton, Ontario, was operating by 1963, using the CANDU (Canadian Deuterium-Uranium) design principles. The first large-scale commercial nuclear power station, Ontario Hydro’s Pickering reactor, was operational in 1971.

But this time Saskatchewan became the new uranium capital of the world. In 1988, the richest uranium find in the world occurred at McArthur River. The mine started production in 1999.

Saskatchewan became the sole province in Canada producing uranium and remains so today. Ontario’s uranium mining period seems to have ended. The two key players in uranium mining in Canada are AREVA, a French owned company, and Cameco, a private Canadian company. AREVA is the largest nuclear power generating company in the world, and ranks third in total uranium production. Cameco was formed in 1988 from two crown corporations, Eldorado Nuclear and Saskatchewan Mining Development Corporation.

The Athabasca Basin – UniqueThe Athabasca Basin, an area of about 100,000 square kilometres, is located primarily in Northern Saskatchewan, spanning the Alberta-Saskatchewan border. The Basin adjoins the Peace-Athabasca Delta, one of the largest freshwater deltas in the world, providing habitat for water birds, including the endangered whooping crane, and wood bison. Canada’s largest national park, Wood Buffalo National Park, designated a UNESCO World Heritage site, includes part of the Delta.

The largest and richest uranium deposits in the world are in the Athabasca Basin. Most ore deposits of uranium worth mining are in the order of 0.1% to 2%. But ore bodies in the Basin far exceed those grades (ranging from about 0.5% to over 20%). For example, the McArthur River mine is the highest-grade uranium mine in the world, averaging about 22% uranium, more than 100 times richer than most mine.

Mining in the 1980s and 1990s was primarily by the open-pit method as the deposits were near the surface. Surface mining is more economical than underground mining and, combined with the very high ore grade found in the Athabasca Basin, made this uranium very competitive in world markets.

In the words of the nuclear industry, “The high ore grade also requires that great care be taken to ensure radiation protection for workers.” At the McArthur River mine, which produced 8,500 tonnes of yellowcake in 2007, remote-control raise-boring methods are used for mining.

Mining Kingdom, Uranium RushOne fifth of all mineral exploration programs in the world will be done in Canada, well over half by foreign companies. With uranium re-emerging as a star mineral commodity, the uranium rush is on. Uranium prices have gone from a low of $7 per pound of yellowcake (U3O8) in 1968 and 1990 to the current price of about $78.

Active exploration for uranium is underway in Saskatchewan, Alberta, the Northwest Territories, Yukon, Nunavut, Manitoba, Ontario, Quebec, New Brunswick, Newfoundland and Labrador, and of course, the eastern, central, and western Athabasca Basin, where over forty companies are active.

The exploration for uranium, mostly on or near First Nations land, is encountering fierce opposition from many communities and organizations. In some cases this has led to the imprisonment of protestors, such as the highly-publicized arrest and imprisonment of a former Ardoch Algonquin chief in Ontario, after he refused to obey a court order to stay away from a proposed mine site on traditional territory.

In Canada, mining is usually governed by provincial regulations. Uranium production is under federal jurisdiction via the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission which regulates uranium mines and mills.

There are significant variations in provincial restrictions on exploration and mining uranium. For example:

British Columbia has a long-standing moratorium on uranium mining and exploration. It was first introduced in 1980, and has been recently renewed.
Nova Scotia established a moratorium in 1982, but there are some indications that the province may lift it.
In July 2008, New Brunswick enacted new regulations to limit uranium exploration and the staking of claims on municipal land, and in watersheds and fields with private wells or within 300 metres of private homes.
On April 8, 2008, the Nunatsiavut Government placed a three-year moratorium on mining and development of uranium on Labrador Inuit Lands. The moratorium does not apply to exploration. The issue is to be revisited after March 31, 2011.
In 1990, residents of Baker Lake in the Thelon Region of the Nunavut voted to ban uranium mining and exploration in their region. However, in September 2007, the ban was overturned.
20 Ontario municipalities, including Ottawa, have called for restrictions, including moratoria, on the exploration and mining of uranium.
Leaving No Stone Unturned
The nuclear industry, including prospectors and mining companies, leaves no stone unturned in their search for uranium. Since uranium is ubiquitous, any place is fair game for exploration, provided the price of uranium war¬rants it. Resistance to their operations can be easily overcome, particularly when governments are favourable to their operations.

In the words of Donna Dillman, a well-known activist in the struggles against uranium exploration in the Sharbot Lake area in Ontario, “Currently, there are numerous groups in Canada and around the world resisting uranium exploration and mining. So it is essential that we come together as one voice. When we do this, and only then, will the media and government give the issue the importance it deserves.”

ResourcesCanadian Coalition for Nuclear Responsibility: www.ccnr.org
Mining Watch Canada: www.miningwatch.ca
Canadian Nuclear Association: www.cna.ca
International Institute of Concern for Public Health: www.IICPH.org

Anna Tilman is a researcher who has worked on several toxic issues, especially mercury. She is a board member of the International Institute of Concern for Public Health. On The Yellowcake Trail was previously printed in the Watershed Sentinel, the independent voice for environmental news in British Columbia, Canada. Visit: http://www.watershedsentinel.ca/

http://www.greenmuze.com/climate/energy/1184-canadas-uranium-mining.html

Monday, May 11, 2009

Group to keep protest alive

Posted By PAUL SCHLIESMANN
Posted 14 hours ago


Opponents of a proposed uranium mining operation near Sharbot Lake say changes to Ontario's Mining Act will not halt their two-year battle.

"No, not at all," said Lynn Daniluk of the Community Coalition Against Mining Uranium. "We have actions planned through out the summer. We have no intention of letting it rest.

"(The changes) didn't cover uranium."

The community coalition joined forces with native bands in the Sharbot Lake area in 2007 to put a stop to a uranium operation proposed by Frontenac Ventures Corporation.

The groups were concerned about potential negative effects on the environment and the health of people living in the area.

Demonstrations and blockades last year led to arrests former Ardoch Algonquin First Nation chief Bob Lovelace spending three and a half months in jail.

In an e-mail from Ecuador last week, Lovelace said the Ontario government has missed a chance to making meaningful changes through Bill 173.

"For all the hype around what the government might have done and the real opportunity that was before them, I think we need to be disappointed," he wrote to the Whig-Standard.

"Change to the legislation does not take place often and what has been proposed does not nearly extend rights to Ontario citizens or recognize Aboriginal title in a way that will avoid conflict and assure that mining practice will be improved."

In December, the Shabot Obaadjiwan, the Snimikobi Algonquin and the Algonquins of Ontario broke away from their protest partners and signed an agreement with Frontenac Ventures and the Ontario government to allow exploratory drilling at the site.

The recent changes to the mining act, which will require wider consultation with aboriginal communities as well as a process to settle disputes, are being touted as ways to avoid similar standoffs in the future.

"I think they've done it. The important stakeholders are speaking well of it," said Victor Pakalnis, the Kimross professor in mining and sustainability at Queen's University.

Pakalnis described the current act as "very archaic."

"It has caused a lot of conflict with landowners and particularly aboriginal communities in the north."

He said the provincial government had to protect the rights of property owners and aboriginal people while also paying attention to the public wealth that is created by mining.

"This is a substantial royalty that goes to the province. You want to benefit from the fact that Canada is a rich country from a mineral point of view," he said.

Marilyn Crawford of the community coalition said one of the positive changes in Bill 173 is that private lands without claims on them cannot be staked. In Bedford district of South Frontenac Township where she lives, however, there are 34 existing claims on private property that will remain in effect.

Though aboriginals must now be consulted about mining proposals, Crawford said they will have no veto power.

"There's a lot of work to be done," she said. "There's no consideration to uranium and the impact on health and the environment. It's treated the same as any other mineral."

Pakalnis said that if proper safeguards are put in place uranium mining can be safe, pointing to the fact that a uranium operation once existed in the Bancroft area.

"You can mine safely, extract the mineral and leave behind an environmentally responsible area for after the mine is finished," he said.

Daniluk, however, remains skeptical.

"It's radioactive. We're not talking about a gravel pit or even a silver or gold mine," she said. "They don't last 4.5 billion years. Some of the products left behind in the (uranium mine) tailing ponds are toxic for 4.5 billion years.

"If someone has evidence that uranium mining is safe, I'd like to see it. There isn't one uranium mine in Canada that hasn't had serious consequences for the community."

http://www.thewhig.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=1562022