Saturday, November 26, 2011

How would uranium affect Hargrave, Chatham Hall?

Pruden Hall is at the center of Chatham Hall's 362-acre campus. Here, you'll find the Well, where students and faculty gather for assemblies and unique performances, as well as Admission and Academic offices, dorm rooms upstairs, and easy access to the dining hall, classrooms, and science and language buildings.
Wednesday, November 16, 2011 12:50 PM EST

I have been watching the skirmishes among the proponents and opponents of uranium mining here in Pittsylvania County.

The primary argument in favor of the proposal is that it would create jobs, a serious issue we must all weigh carefully.

The principle argument against mining is the potential for radiation poisoning, a dire problem that could effect tens of thousands in this county as well as our neighbors especially to the east and south (consider the aquifer and direction of river flow).

Let's overlook the fact that many of our elected officials are relying primarily on data provided by Virginia Uranium, the "defendant" in this case.

(To me, that's rather like having the fox guard the henhouse).

What's missing is information on those mines with less than stellar performances.


Googling mining in Arizona, and referencing lawsuits, it will be noted that myriad cases have been brought against mine operators and their backers, such cases resulting from radiation leakages and recorded instances of cancer at many times the normal rate.

These suits have been foundering for years in the courts without apparent resolution.

There seems to be precious little published on the subject of Mother Nature, at least of any scientific note. Considering climate, there is always the potential for catastrophe.

While Arizona, as an arid state, nevertheless has a problem with radiation run-off and seepage, what far greater risk would Virginia take with its abundant, sometimes torrential, rainfall and high watertable?

Personally, I would very much like to see a hydrology report for our area, indicating not just the effect of run-off, but ground seepage, as well.

(Burying the tailings could be as dangerous as containing them behind a dam.)

Let's consider employment. Chatham has two exceptional educational institutions, both private: Chatham Hall and Hargrave Military Academy.

These fine schools employ highly educated and trained teachers and support staff, a tangible boon to our county seat. It's something measurable and real.

Consider this: If I had a son or daughter enrolled in either of these schools and uranium mining was approved, my child would be immediately withdrawn and enrolled far away from any potential harm.

Now, do you honestly believe I would be the only parent to do so? A parent does what's best for his child.

What would happen to Chatham if these institutions were forced to close? And how would it effect the balance of employment?

Something to ponder, isn't it?

Jeffrey R. Carson
Danville, Va

http://www.wpcva.com/articles/2011/11/17/chatham/opinion/opinion06.txt