Friday, July 30, 2010

The Virginia Roanoke River Basin Advisory Committee Meeting


The Virginia Roanoke River Basin Advisory Committee will meet on
Monday, August 2, 2010 from 10am until 12pm
at the Henry County Service Training Center.

Discussion will continue on the Water Allocation Ad Hoc Committee Report and responses received.

The March 2010 report from the Water Allocation Ad Hoc Commitee, which will be discussed at the meetings, can be found here:

A chart summarizing responses to the Ad Hoc Committee Report can be found here:

All responses to the Ad Hoc Committee Report can be found here:

The Roanoke River Basin Bi-State Commission will meet on Wednesday, August 18, 2010 in Clarksville, VA. Meeting details and related documents will be available in the near future.
Read more:



Thursday, July 29, 2010

Project Information : Uranium Mining in Virginia / Division on Earth and Life Studies: Make Comments about the picks




Comment: Please write the NAS with your ideas, to me it looks like a pro uranium mining and pro nuclear power group with the a couple of EPA workers which in the past has not protected our mountains in Virginia by letting coal companies dump 2,000 miles of wasted rock in our streams which destroyed the streams, the EPA has not enforced the Clean Air Act or the Clean Water Act consistently in the past. The nuclear industry dictates to the NRC therefore we do not know the full pollution history of nuke plants. To me, the local, Canadian company who paid for the Uranium Study is jumping for joy right now, I guess you really do get what you pay for in most cases! 

Committee Membership Information

Project Title: Uranium Mining in Virginia
PIN: DELS-BESR-09-06

Major Unit:
Division on Earth and Life Studies

Sub Unit: Board on Earth Sciences & Resources
Water Science and Technology Board


RSO: Feary, David

Subject/Focus Area: Earth Sciences

Committee Membership
Date Posted: 07/29/2010


Dr. Joaquin Ruiz - (Chair):  Geosciences ?????
University of Arizona

JOAQUIN RUIZ is Executive Dean of the Colleges of Letters, Arts and Science, Dean of the College of Science, and a Professor of Geosciences at the University of Arizona. Prior to being appointed as Dean of the College of Science, Dr. Ruiz served as the Head of the University of Arizona’s Department of Geosciences from 1995 to 2000. Dr. Ruiz is an expert in radiogenic isotopes applied to the study of regional tectonics, origin of magmas, and hydrothermal ore deposits. He was elected to the Mexican Academy of Science in 2006. He has served as a member of the U.S. National Committee for the International Association for Volcanology and Chemistry of the Earth’s Interior; a member of the National Science Foundation’s Instrumentation Panel with the Division on Earth Sciences; and was a panel member of the Facilities Program and Centers for Excellence in Science and Technology Program with the Directorate of Education. Dr. Ruiz is a Fellow of the Geological Society of America and of the Society of Economic Geologists. He received a B.Sc. in Geology and a B.S. in Chemistry from the University of Miami and a M.S. and Ph.D. in Geology from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

Dr. Corby G. Anderson :  Loves Uranium Mining: CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Colorado School of Mines

CORBY ANDERSON is the Harrison Western Professor of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering at the Colorado School of Mines. Dr. Anderson is an expert in the fields of mineral processing, waste minimization and recycling, has an extensive background in industrial-oriented research, and has more than 30 years of academic and applied experience in mining, chemical, and materials engineering. In 2008 he received the Milton Wadsworth Award from SME for his contributions to advance the field of chemical metallurgy. Dr. Anderson holds a Ph.D. in Mining Engineering - Metallurgy from the University of Idaho, as well as a Bachelors degree in Chemical Engineering and a Masters degree in Metallurgical Engineering.


Dr. Lawrence W. Barnthouse:  demonstrations for nuclear????
LWB Environmental Services, Inc.

LAWRENCE W. BARNTHOUSE is the President and Principal Scientist of LWB Environmental Services, Inc. His consulting activities include 316(b) demonstrations for nuclear and non-nuclear power plants, Superfund ecological risk assessments, Natural Resource Damage Assessments, risk-based environmental restoration planning, and a variety of other projects involving close interactions with regulatory and resource management agencies. Dr. Barnthouse has authored or co-authored more than 90 publications relating to ecological risk assessment. He is a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Hazard/Risk Assessment Editor of the journal Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, and Founding Editorial Board Member of the new journal Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management. He has served on the National Research Council Board of Environmental Studies and Toxicology and on several National Research Council committees, and was a member of the peer review panel for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Guidelines for Ecological Risk Assessment. Dr. Barnthouse holds a PhD in biology from the University of Chicago.

Dr. Scott C. Brooks
Oak Ridge National Laboratory - Loves Nukes = Loves Uranium Mining:CONFLICT OF INTEREST

SCOTT C. BROOKS is Senior Scientist in the Environmental Sciences Division of Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Dr. Brooks’ research focuses on the biogeochemistry of advecting fluids in the subsurface and the geochemical factors influencing the fate and transport of solutes. He has conducted numerous experiments at the laboratory and field scale studying the fate and transformation of radionuclides in the environment. He has Ph.D. and M.S. degrees in Environmental Sciences from the University of Virginia.

Dr. Patricia A. Buffler :  Committee on Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation
University of California, Berkeley

PATRICIA BUFFLER (IOM) is professor of epidemiology and holds the Kenneth and Marjorie Kaiser Chair in Cancer Epidemiology in the School of Public Health at University of California, Berkeley. Dr. Buffler’s research interests include the environmental causes of cancer, especially gene-environment interaction and childhood cancer, lung cancer, leukemia, brain cancer, and breast cancer; epidemiologic research methods; and the uses of epidemiologic data in health policy. She has served on numerous committees of the National Research Council, including the Committee on Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation, and Committee on Emerging Issues and Data on Environmental Contaminants. Dr. Buffler was elected to the Institute of Medicine in 1994. She received a Ph.D. in epidemiology from the University of California, Berkeley.

Dr. Michel Cuney:  Nancy, France : invaluable insights concerning mining techniques (loves uranium mining): CONFLICT OF INTEREST
CNRS

MICHEL CUNEY is director of the research team, Genesis and Management of Mineral Resources for the National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS) at the Henri Poincaré Universite in Nancy, France. He has worked mainly on the geochemistry of uranium in various geological environments since 1972. He has visited and/or worked on most major uranium deposits of the world, and has published about 180 scientific papers in this disciplinary area. Dr. Cuney is one of the world's experts on the genesis of uranium deposits and uranium geology, and he will provide invaluable insights concerning mining techniques that would be used to extract uranium from deposits in Virginia as well as the possible effects on the local environment. Dr. Cuney received his Docteur es Sciences (Ph.D.) degree from Henri Poincaré Universite.

Dr. Peter L. deFur : University of Calgary (that means Canada.....!!!!)
Environmental Stewardship Concepts

PETER L. DEFUR is President of Environmental Stewardship Concepts, LLC (ESC), an independent private consulting firm in Richmond, Virginia. He is also an affiliate Associate Professor at the Center for Environmental Studies, Virginia Commonwealth University where he conducts research on environmental health and ecological risk assessment. Dr. deFur has over thirty years’ experience providing technical services regarding the cleanup of contaminated sites to community organizations across the country. Dr. deFur received B.S. and M.S. degrees from the College of William and Mary, and a Ph.D. in biology from the University of Calgary.

Dr. Mary R. English:  familiar with the environmental effects of mining and related regulatory issues. (From TN, TVA area????
The University of Tennessee, Knoxville

MARY ENGLISH is a Senior Fellow at the Institute for a Secure and Sustainable Environment, The University of Tennessee in Knoxville. She is a social scientist who is Her work has focused on energy and environmental policy and has included research on mechanisms for involving stakeholders in public policy decisions, how "the community" should be defined within the context of community-based environmental efforts, information-gathering and analytic tools to improve environmental decision making, and guidance on conducting socioeconomic impact assessments. She previously served on the NRC Board on Radioactive Management as well as the NRC Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology. Dr. English has a M.S. from the University of Massachusetts and a Ph.D. in Sociology from the University of Tennessee, Knoxville.

Dr. R. William Field :  international collaborative radiation-related epidemiolgic
University of Iowa College of Public Health

R. WILLIAM FIELD is a Professor in the Department of Occupational and Environmental Health and in the Department of Epidemiology, University of Iowa College of Public Health. He also serves as Director of the Occupational Epidemiology Training Program, at the NIOSH-Heartland Center for Occupational Health and Safety, and Director of the Pulmonary Outcomes Cluster, NIEHS - Environmental Health Sciences Research Center (EHSRC). Dr. Field has been active in numerous national and international collaborative radiation-related epidemiolgic projects for many years and has served on the editorial boards of several national and international scientific journals.. His research interests fall into the broad categories of environmental epidemiology, occupational epidemiology, radioepidemiology, cancer epidemiology, immune-mediated disease epidemiology, health physics, biomonitoring, risk perception, and novel methods of retrospective exposure assessment. Dr. Field received his Ph.D. in preventive medicine and environmental health from the University of Iowa.

Dr. Jill Lipoti :  radiation exposure (EPA???)
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection

JILL LIPOTI is Director of the Division of Environmental Safety and Health at the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. Prior to assuming this position, she was an Assistant Director with responsility for directing the state’s radiation protection programs. Dr. Lipoti also serves as adjunct assistant professor, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey - School of Public Health, Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, specializing in radiation exposure, and preparedness for chemical and radiological emergencies. She has provided advice to the International Atomic Energy Agency regarding radiation safety and security, and has served on the Radiation Advisory Committee of EPA’s Science Advisory Board. She has M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in environmental science from Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey.

Dr. Paul A. Locke : evaluating radiation protection initiatives
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

PAUL A. LOCKE, an environmental health scientist and attorney, is an Associate Professor at the Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health in the Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Division of Toxicology. He holds an MPH from Yale University School of Medicine, a DrPH from the Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health and a JD degree from Vanderbilt University School of Law. Dr. Locke’s research and practice focus on how decision makers use environmental health science and toxicology in regulation and policy-making and how environmental health sciences influence the policy-making process. His areas of study include designing and evaluating radiation protection initiatives and radiation policies, especially in the areas of low dose radiation science, radon risk reduction, safe disposal of high level radioactive waste, and use of CT as a diagnostic screening tool. Dr. Locke directs the School’s Doctor of Public Health program in Environmental Health Sciences. Dr. Locke was a member of the National Academy of Sciences Nuclear and Radiation Studies Board from 2003 to 2009, and has served on five National Research Council committees. He is also a member of the editorial boards of Risk Analysis: An International Journal and the International Journal of Low Radiation and is on the Board of Directors of the NCRP (National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements).
Mr. Henry Schnell  ---BIG FAT NO TO THE NUKES OF FRANCE:specializing in uranium metallurgy, operations, and mining projects-CANADA: conflict of interest
Areva, Inc.



HENRY A. SCHNELL holds the position of Technical Authority (Senior Expert) in the Expertise & Technical Department, Mining Business Unit, with AREVA NC Inc., In his role as Technical Authority for uranium, he is responsible for review and support of existing operations and new projects world wide, and for final technical authorization of plant design and modifications. Mr. Schnell has 41 years of experience in management, plant operations, plant design, engineering, and research and development in mining and ore treatment, and 21 years of this has been specializing in uranium metallurgy, operations, and mining projects. He has a B.S. (Honours) degree from the University of Alberta, Edmonton and other extensive training in metallurgy and project management.

Dr. Jeffrey J. Wong : environmental measurements, biological and exposure monitoring, toxicology and risk assessment....ANOTHER EPA????
California Environmental Protection Agency

JEFFREY J. WONG is Deputy Director of the Science, Pollution Prevention and Technology Program for the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) at the California EPA and serves as DTSC's Chief Scientist. This program's activities include environmental measurements, biological and exposure monitoring, toxicology and risk assessment, and green chemistry and pollution prevention. Before his current appointment Dr. Wong served as chief of DTSC's Human and Ecological Risk Division. He served by presidential appointment on the U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board from 1996 until 2002. Dr. Wong has served on several National Academies committees, including the Committee on Risk-Based Approaches for Disposition of Transuranic and High-Level Radioactive Waste, the Committee on Environmental Remediation at Naval Facilities, the Committee on Remedial Action Priorities for Hazardous Waste Sites and the Panel for Review of the DOE Environmental Restoration Priority System. Dr. Wong received his Ph.D. in pharmacology and toxicology from the University of California at Davis.

Comment on Provisional Committee Appointments


Viewers may communicate with the National Academies at any time over the project's duration.

In addition, formal comments on the provisional appointments to a committee of the National Academies are solicited during the 20-calendar day period following the posting of the membership and, as described below, these comments will be considered before committee membership is finalized. We welcome your comments (Use the Feedback link below).

Please note that the appointments made to this committee are provisional, and changes may be made.

No appointment shall be considered final until we have evaluated relevant information bearing on the committee's composition and balance.

This information will include the confidential written disclosures to The National Academies by each member-designate concerning potential sources of bias and conflict of interest pertaining to his or her service on the committee; information from discussion of the committee's composition and balance that is conducted in closed session at its first meeting and again whenever its membership changes; and any public comments that we have received on the membership during the 20-calendar day formal public comment period.

If additional members are appointed to this committee, an additional 20-calendar day formal public comment period will be allowed.

It is through this process that we determine whether the committee contains the requisite expertise to address its task and whether the points of views of individual members are adequately balanced such that the committee asa whole can address its charge objectively.


You have 20 day(s) remaining after today to provide comments during the formal comment period.

Please click below to make your comments:

http://www8.nationalacademies.org/cp/FeedBack.aspx?key=49253&type=committee




http://www8.nationalacademies.org/cp/committeeview.aspx?key=49253

Wednesday, July 28, 2010

Nuclear energy is too risky (uranium mining/milling) / Who wants to be 'Saudi Arabia of nuclear fuel (uranium mining and milling)?'


Comment: Great letters and so true. Outsiders are writing about uranium mining and milling is needed in our county to support the nuke plants! Outsiders, keep your untruths about nuke power to yourself! Virginia deserves better than a bunch of open pit uranium mines and uranium milling ruining our water, land and air! Virginia young water and fracture rock is enough facts to stop the idea of uranium mining. Just read the 1999 USGS report and the VA Tech study about VA water problems! No to uranium mining and milling!

Nuclear energy is too risky

Wednesday, July 28, 2010 9:13 AM EDT

I have to disagree with Mr. Doug Crowther (Star-Tribune July 7, 2010) on many points of his comments of "Why America needs Nuclear,"

He being a resident of Concord, Va., is like those who were appointed on the subcommittee to gather citizens input on Uranium mining in Pittsylvania, County.

None of these people live in or near where the mining will take place if the moratorium is lifted.

How would he feel if it was right in his back yard?

Should Pittsylvania County citizens give up their rights to have mining and milling of uranium for the good of all Virginia and the Country?

Our founding fathers declared war on England and many Pittsylvania County citizens are also in a battle to protect their property, health of their families and their way of life.

I don't believe that Mr. Crowther will move next to where mining and milling will take place with his family and grandchildren.

This issue is bigger than a landfill or federal prison in our back yard.

I believe that nuclear power is clean energy till something happens. Can we afford a disaster like Chernobyl? Look at the results of that accident. Those citizens will never return to their homes and way of life.

What about Three Mile Island?

Man can take all the precautions and analyze all scenarios of what "if" and we still wound up with the largest Gulf oil disaster known to man.

We need to invest in solar and wind energy production. There are millions of rooftops in which to install towers and panels and not utilize any footprint on the land.

Man has taken the easy path in developing available energy mainly fossil fuels and nuclear.

I believe we can develop small power sources to adapt to individual homes and they would be the answer to truly "clean" energy in America and reduce our dependency on fossil and nuclear fuels.

Marshall A. Ecker
Gretna, VA



Who wants to be 'Saudi Arabia of nuclear fuel (uranium mining and milling)?'

Wednesday, July 28, 2010 9:13 AM EDT

Mr. Robert Bodnar, sir: You have presented an argument in favor of lifting the 1982 moratorium against mining and milling uranium in Virginia.

Most of it is true, with the exception of the description of Virginia becoming "the Saudi Arabia of nuclear fuel."

By most estimates, there exists enough uranium in the ground at the farm of Mr. Walter Coles in Pittsylvania County to supply the existing nuclear power industry of the United States for nearly two years.

By their own estimates, this extraction process is projected to take as little as 15 years and as much as 30 years to complete.

This ore is then milled - that means it is pulverized to a "talcum powder" like dust, treated with sulfuric acid and other goodies, in concert with an immense amount of water to produce what is known as "yellowcake" or, uranium 238.

Trouble is, that in order to render one pound of U-238, worth about $42, it requires that 1,000 pounds of ore must be dug out of the ground - and the leftovers are the 999 pounds of highly radioactive tailings.

These tailings are going to be radioactive for as long as a half-life of 4.5 billion years, in the case of uranium 238.

The Santoy Resources website is full of pertinent information, and under the company prospectus for the Coles Hill project, their plan is to declare an area eight miles from the center of each hole a "dead zone."

Within this dead zone they expect to lose all ground water and drilled wells. That water will no longer be potable.

Amid all the hype about employment as a result of lifting the moratorium are the stark facts that the uranium mining industry employs less than 500 people in the entire United States.

As well, there is nearly a 100 percent failure record on the part of the mining industry for being responsible for the cleanup of these sites.

Nearly all have been abandoned by the industry and thus qualify, and gain the distinction of becoming toxic waste site funded by the American taxpayer.

Mr. Bodnar, you have somehow overlooked all of the history of the catastrophic health and environmental results of uranium mining on the local residents and nature itself.

In addition, you have not mentioned that radon gas is called "a daughter of uranium." That is, radon 222 only comes to us as a result of the decaying of uranium.

What that means to scientists is that everywhere there was a "radon scare" in the 1970s and '80s, there exists deposits of uranium -all through Appalachia from north Georgia, western North Carolina, the piedmont foothills and Blue Ridge Mountains of Virginia, throughout the Shenandoah Valley as well as all along the US-29 corridor.

According to the United States Geological Service, these deposits run up into central Maryland, southwestern Pennsylvania, and into Delaware and the District of Columbia. They even show what appears to be a huge deposit down in Greensboro, N.C.

This is definitely an issue that will affect a much broader area than merely Pittsylvania County.

I live eight miles from the proposed "north hole" of the Coles Hill site. By my best estimate, Roanoke is approximately 50 miles as the crow flies (as dust flies) from the site.

Now, the question: Would I like Pittsylvania County to become the "Saudi Arabia of nuclear fuel?"

No way!

It isn't worth the trade-off so that a Canadian corporation calling itself "Virginia Resources" can take most of the profits back home to the UK.

Virginia won't even get much taxes from the "experiment" since it will all be sold on the open commodity markets, and thus not subject to Virginia state corporate taxes.

There may be, one day, a reason to move to Saudi Arabia because it isn't radioactive there. Other than that - no!

I like it just fine here, where I am. I have good air to breathe and pure water to drink, and I stand opposed to lifting the 1982 moratorium on mining or milling of uranium in the Commonwealth of Virginia.

Hunter Austin
Hurt, VA

http://www.wpcva.com/articles/2010/07/28/chatham/opinion/opinion02.txt
http://www.wpcva.com/articles/2010/07/28/chatham/opinion/opinion03.txt

Tuesday, July 27, 2010

/Overview: EPA’s Review of Uranium and Thorium Environmental Regulations / Subpart W Rulemaking Activity

Cotter Uranium Mill in CO!


Comment:  Please submit your comments or ideas to SubpartW@epa.gov about the problems of uranium milling!  No to uranium mining and milling!


Overview: EPA’s Review of Uranium and Thorium Environmental Regulations (40 CFR Part 192)

EPA issued regulations for uranium and thorium milling under the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA). The regulations at 40 CFR 192 set standards for the protection of public health, safety and the environment from radiological and other hazards from the processing of uranium and thorium ores and disposal of associated wastes. They apply to both operating and inactive facilities.

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and their Agreement States use EPA’s standards in their oversight of uranium and thorium facility operations and in issuing licenses for source material. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) uses them in their management of closed uranium mills and in the cleanup of contaminated soil and buildings.

EPA last revised these regulations in 1995, and is currently reviewing them to determine if additional changes are needed. We invite you to participate in the review and provide your thoughts in this discussion forum.

Review of Related Regulations

EPA also sets environmental standards for uranium extraction facilities under the Clean Air Act, Safe Drinking Water Act, and Clean Water Act. The regulations issued under the Clean Air Act are under review. You can learn about and participate in this review at the Subpart W Rulemaking Activity web page.

At this time, EPA is not reviewing regulations that implement the Safe Drinking Water Act’s Underground Injection Control program that covers In Situ Leaching. Clean Water Act standards for uranium extraction facilities are not under review

Read more:
http://blog.epa.gov/milltailingblog/


Subpart W Rulemaking Activity

NESHAP Subpart W is a radon emission standard for operating uranium mill tailings. In accordance with the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, EPA has formed a workgroup to review, and possibly revise the standard. EPA invites and encourages the public to provide comments on our review of Subpart W.

As the Workgroup on Subpart W develops its tentative rulemaking, we will provide up-to-date information on recent or upcoming conference calls, resource documents, and contact information. Please check back regularly, as more items will be added.

On this page:

Public Participation by E-Mail

EPA welcomes public participation in the review of Subpart W. We are interested in hearing about issues that you think EPA should address in the rule, as well as any thoughts you may have on the review process. Please submit your thoughts to SubpartW@epa.gov

The body of your messages will be posted to the website periodically during regular business hours, Monday through Friday. Please note that EPA will not be able to reply to all messages submitted here.


Messages should pertain to the specifics of Subpart W, and meet the expectations of polite public discourse. We reserve the discretion not to post comments that: contain obscene, indecent, or profane language;
contain threats or defamatory statements; contain hate speech directed at race, color, sex, sexual orientation, national origin, ethnicity, age, religion, or disability; or  promote or endorse services or products. (Note that non-commercial links that are relevant to the topic or another comment are acceptable.)

By posting your comments or other work, you grant EPA and anyone viewing the EPA Web site irrevocable permission to copy, distribute, make derivatives, display or perform the commenter’s work publicly and free-of-charge. Do not submit copyrighted or other proprietary material in any form unless you clearly indicate that you have permission to do so.

All messages will become part of the Public Docket if EPA proceeds with a rulemaking to revise Subpart W.

To protect your privacy, please do not include information (e.g., an e-mail address or phone number) in the text of your comment that identifies you. You can find additional guidance as to how EPA regards privacy issues within the privacy policy provided on EPA’s main Web site.


EPA welcomes public participation in the review of Subpart W. We are interested in hearing about issues that you think EPA should address in the rule, as well as any thoughts you may have on the review and rulemaking process.You may submit your thoughts and read what others have submitted on our message page.

Click here to send EPA your ideas:  SubpartW@epa.gov


Conference Call Information

EPA will hold quarterly conference calls with interested stakeholders. The next conference call will occur on Tuesday October 5, 2010 at 11am EDT, 10am CDT, 9am MDT and 8am PDT. The call in number is 1-866-299-3188. You will be prompted for a conference code, which will be 2023439563. After entering the conference code press the # key and you will then be placed into the conference call.

Minutes from December 3, 2009 conference call.
Minutes from January 5, 2010 conference call.
Minutes from April 6, 2010 conference call.
Mintues from July 6, 2010 conference call.

Tentative Completion Estimate

EPA plans to propose a decision on Subpart W in late winter of 2011. After allowing for public comment and or hearings we plan to have a final decision in late winter of 2012. This estimate will be revised as needed.

http://www.epa.gov/radiation/neshaps/subpartw/rulemaking-activity.html

US Govt urges countries to adopt payment disclosure laws

The White House, which passed a bill last week forcing oil, gas and mining companies to disclose payments to foreign companies, issued a statement urging others to do the same

Author: Lesley Wroughton (Reuters)
Posted: Monday , 26 Jul 2010

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -

New U.S legislation that forces gas, oil and mining companies to disclose payments to foreign governments should become a global standard for more corporate transparency, the White House said on Friday.

The Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, signed into law by President Barack Obama this week, includes a little-known provision that requires energy and mining firms registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to reveal their tax and revenue payments to foreign governments.

The White House drew attention to its importance in a statement on Friday saying it would work with other countries to adopt similar rules to halt back-room deals that cost taxpayers in lost royalties.

Across Africa and elsewhere, natural resource wealth has failed to translate into better living conditions for millions of people, while trade in "blood" diamonds has been blamed for fueling wars.

"This legislation will immediately shed light on billions in payments between multinational corporations and governments, giving citizens the information they need to monitor companies and to hold governments accountable," the White House said.

Development and anti-poverty groups have hailed the provision as a major step for increasing the transparency of transactions between international mining and oil companies and governments in resource-rich poor countries.

Development groups have long called for governments in developed countries to take steps to stop the billions of dollars that go missing each year through corruption in oil, gas and mining revenues.

Governments and industry joined forces in 2000 to halt the trade in "blood" diamonds used to finance such wars as those in Angola, Ivory Coast, Democratic Republic of Congo and Serra Leone.

The so-called Kimberley Process set out requirements for controlling rough diamond production and trade.

"This provision sets a new standard for corporate transparency," the White House said of the legislation.

"The United States is committed to working with other countries to ensure the implementation of similar disclosure requirements in other financial markets and will make this a priority in the year ahead," it said.

Read more:
http://www.mineweb.com/mineweb/view/mineweb/en/page72068?oid=108590&sn=Detail

Senator Says Uranium Plant Could Cost Billions More Than Planned

Comment:  When it comes to anything nuclear related which anything uranium is, the nukes have a hard time adding 1 + 1 which equals 3 to the nukes.  Next problems with nukes, their greedy little nukie hands are always had for state and federal government to pay for the projects!  No to nukes and anything related to uranium mining and milling!

Tuesday, July 27, 2010

U.S. Senator Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) yesterday suggested the expense of building a highly enriched uranium processing center at the Y-12 National Security Complex in Tennessee might ultimately amount to between $4 billion and $5 billion, the Knoxville News Sentinel reported. (see GSN, Oct. 29, 2009).

The range was significantly higher than the informal federal estimate of $1.4 billion to $3.5 billion for constructing the planned Uranium Processing Facility.

Read more:
http://www.globalsecuritynewswire.org/gsn/nw_20100727_2953.php

Monday, July 26, 2010

A nuclear paradox - Uranium Mill


29 June 2010

PARADOX, Colo: A proposal to build the nation's first uranium mill in 25 years has divided the community there between those who see good jobs and a stable economy and neighbors fearful of uranium's history of health impacts, environmental harm and unstable prices.

Uranium has been a boom and bust industry in Western Colorado, where communities still struggle in the wake of the last bust in the early 1980s.

But this is not a tidy story, with camps cleanly divided between those who reap benefit and those who see harm. Many in the valley have seen both sides: The lure of a steady paycheck, the devastating effects of ill health and premature death.

Milling town of Uravan, the town was evacuated in 1984 due to extensive radioactive contamination. After becoming a federal Superfund clean-up site in 1986, the site was reclaimed in 2008 at a cost of $127 million, paid for Vanadium Corp.'s owner, Union Carbide Corporation. In August 2009, a federal appeals court ruled against past residents of the mill town who sought compensation for their illnesses, siding with Union Carbide.

The Cotter uranium mill in Cañon City, Colo., (another federal Superfund clean-up site) has had 99 violations in the last 10 years, according to the group Colorado Citizens Against Toxic Waste. Leaking tailings ponds have contaminated area groundwater.

Tourism and renewable energy development will bring safer, more stable economic growth, opponents say. A 2009 study by the Sonoran Institute [PDF] predicts that uranium development could hinder tourism in the nearby resort town of Gateway, Colo., by degrading natural and scenic resources.

One family who left the area knows well the paradox uranium has brought to the region. They lived in Uravan in the 1960s and paid a tragic price for living in the old mill town. Three daughters died of cancer.

Read more:
http://wwwp.dailyclimate.org/tdc-newsroom/2010/06/a-nuclear-paradox

Sunday, July 25, 2010

Issues at Operating Uranium Mines and Mills - Ranger, Australia

Flooded Ranger Uranium Pit

(last updated 12 Jun 2010)
Ranger (Northern Territory)


Traditional Owners of Ranger uranium mine site alarmed by new spills into Kakadu National Park, call into question mine expansion project

Millions of litres of radioactive water from the Ranger uranium mine have flowed into internationally acclaimed and World Heritage-listed wetlands in Kakadu National Park. Traditional owners say they will oppose plans for a huge expansion of the 30-year-old mine by Energy Resources of Australia, unless the company upgrades outdated environmental protection procedures.

The Rio Tinto-owned ERA has tried to play down an alarming and unexplained spike in contamination in water flowing from the mine into Kakadu's Magela Creek between April 9 and 11, 2010, The Age can reveal. About 40 Aborigines live downstream from a site where a measure probe recorded up to five times the warning level of electrical conductivity, which is a measure of contaminants including uranium, sulphate and radium.

Environmental group Environment Centre Northern Territory has been shown evidence showing the spike, which ERA representatives said had originated upstream from the mine and was not ERA's fault.

But, asked about the contamination, ERA admitted the source ''could not be determined and investigations are continuing''. ''It is possible that these have come from the Ranger operations,'' it said. ERA's handling of the spike and other environmental concerns about the mine have strained its relations with the Gundjeihmi Aboriginal Corporation, which represents the Mirarr traditional owners.

In another unreported mishap at the mine, in December 2009 a poorly engineered dam collapsed, spilling 6 million litres of radioactive water into the Gulungul Creek, which flows into Kakadu.

Justin O'Brien, the Gundjeihmi corporation's executive officer, said unless the company changes its environmental procedures, the Mirarr will not support any expansion of the mine - that includes a heap leaching plant, a tunnel under flood-plains, a 1000-person accommodation village, 650 evaporation ponds and a one-square-kilometre tailings dam. The expansion, costing hundreds of millions of dollars, would extend the mine's operation to at least 2021. (The Age May 24, 2010)

The head of the Supervising Scientist Division, Alan Hughes, said his own monitoring showed the recently revealed spikes were magnesium sulphate and no other contaminants of note. (Sydney Morning Herald May 26, 2010)

He said there was a spike in salinity levels because run-off water from a retention pond had spilled into a billabong connected to the creek, but no significant uranium was detected in the water. "(ABC May 27, 2010)

The company that operates the Ranger uranium mine has confirmed higher-than-normal salt levels in a creek in Kakadu National Park is a result of its operations. Energy Resources of Australia (ERA) has investigated two salinity spikes in Magela Creek downstream of the mine in April. Chief executive Rob Atkinson says run-off water from the mine had flowed into the creek. (ABC June 12, 2010)

Uranium concentrations in tailings seepage at Ranger uranium mine 5400 times background; rehabilitation impossible

Contaminated water seeping from the Ranger uranium mine in Kakadu National Park has a uranium concentration more than 5,000 times the normal level, a Senate estimates committee has heard.

The Office of the Supervising Scientist today told the committee that water seeping from underneath the dam has about 5,400 times the level of uranium than the natural background level. Greens Senator Scott Ludlam says the environmental regulator told the committee about 100,000 litres of water seeps from the tailings dam every day. Mr Ludlam says the water has been leaking from the dam for years. He says the regulator says it will be impossible to rehabilitate the site.

"The uranium concentation in the billabong surrounding the mine are about three to five parts per billion," he said. "But the uranium in the processed water that is leaking from beneath the tailings dam is 27,000 parts per billion. So it's roughly 5,500 times as much uramium in that water as there is the surrounding environment and that means the company has got a huge problem." (ABC Feb. 9, 2010)

The reported uranium concentration in the seepage (equiv. to 27 mg/l) is slighthly higher than that to be used for a uranium byproduct recovery project in the Talvivaara nickel/zinc mine in Finland - conincidentally announced the same day. Maybe, ERA should contract this company to deal with this seepage...
> Download Transcript of Environment, Communications, and the Arts Committee, Feb. 9, 2010 (PDF)


Preliminary results of probe into tailings leak at Ranger uranium mine not made public

The Commonwealth supervising scientist of the Ranger uranium mine at Kakadu National Park says investigations are continuing into water contamination at the site. Alan Hughes has told a Senate estimates committee that Energy Resources of Australia has conducted geophysical surveys to determine the impact and extent of leaking from a tailings dam at the mine. Mr Hughes says the company has only preliminary results from the surveys and is not sure if ERA will make the findings public. Greens Senator Scott Ludlam is demanding the report be made public as soon as possible. (ABC Oct. 20, 2009)
> Download Transcript of Environment, Communications, and the Arts Committee, Oct. 20, 2009 (1.1M PDF)

Pit wall instability causes interruptions to operations at Ranger mine

In the September 2009 quarter, "total material mined was 4 percent lower than the June 2009 quarter due to some intermittent interruptions to operations to allow increased surveillance of a known and localised area of instability on the southern wall of the pit." (ERA September 2009 Quarter Operations Review, Oct. 14, 2009)

Read more:
http://www.wise-uranium.org/umopaura.html

Saturday, July 24, 2010

Chemical Accident Prompts Road Closure :Evacuations Reported Near Fairview



Comment: The proposed uranium mining and milling in VA will have accidents like this too. The huge trucks will be going thru Chatham, VA neighborhood to get to Rt. 29, which is also a twisted, turning road which travels a very busy area near Tight Squeeze and Blairs! A lot of trucks are not marked if they are carrying yellowcake! No to uranium mining!

POSTED: 5:04 pm CDT July 22, 2010

MAJOR COUNTY, Okla. --
An accident involving a vehicle carrying cesium forced the closure of a road in Major County, according to the Oklahoma Highway Patrol.

Cesium Accident Leads To Evacuations

According to a news release from the Oklahoma Department of Public Safety, U.S. Highway 412 at Bouse Junction east to State Highway 58 at Ringwood was shut down for containment purposes.
Fairview police said there were evacuations in the area.

What is Cesium?  It is a rare metallic chemical element which is used in an assortment of industries. It also has a wide range of isotopes, many of which are radioactive. Since cesium is highly reactive, the element is not usually found in a pure form in nature; most of the world's cesium comes from minerals and nuclear fission. Consumers do not generally interact directly with cesium or its isotopes, although they may own products which contain a cesium component.

Read more:
http://www.koco.com/news/24358724/detail.html
http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-cesium.htm

STOP Uranium Drilling at the Grand Canyon


Comment:  No to uranium mining and milling anywhere, is not needed!

The Obama administration is currently considering halting environmental degradation around the Grand Canyon and you can support these actions RIGHT NOW!

The Bush administration approved drilling for uranium at 39 sites near the Grand Canyon south rim in 2008.

This decision led to a rush in claims for mining the radioactive mineral near this iconic park.

The House reacted to these developments in June 2008.   At that time the House Natural Resources Committee ordered 1 million acres of Bureau of Land Management and Forest Service national park land to be withdrawn from new uranium mining claims.

The granting of these permits rested on a 19th century law.  The 1872 Mining Law allows gold, uranium and other hard rock metals to be taken from most western public lands almost for free and with few restrictions or cleanup requirements.

Now, huge mining corporations are abusing this law to establish large scale mining structures right next to national monuments.

The final straw occurred this year, after the Bureau of Land Management authorized Quaterra Alaska Inc. to conduct eight uranium mine exploration operations at five separate projects north of Grand Canyon National Park and west of the Kaibab Plateau.

To view the documents (provided by the Center for Biological Diversity and the Grand Canyon Trust) please go to http://www.eenews.net/public/25/10817/features/documents/2009/05/06/document_gw_01.pdf.

Secretary Ken Salazar of the Interior Department barred all filing of claims on the acreage around the Grand Canyon National Park this past July for two years.

The two year moratorium will allow the Interior Department to study whether the land should be permanently withdrawn from mining activity.

The authority for the moratorium rests upon General Mining Act of 1872, which does not allow for the negation of certain mining contracts because of the environmental impact.  The only recourse for previously authorized permits is the buying of the permits through federal monies.

This was done in 1996 when the federal government paid $65 million to buy out patented claims just three miles from Yellowstone National ParkSTOP Uranium Drilling at the Grand Canyon

Care2 has created an online petition that allows you to create an e-mail addressed to Secretary Salazar telling him to protect our parks and forests on a permanent basis by working with Congress to modernize the 1872 Mining Law.

Please show your support for Secretary Salazar and your commitment to stopping mining around our national landmarks by going here, http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/537758450?z00m=19785502

Read more:
http://nx.pp.ru/visit-212800.html

Sean Fitzpatrick is a burgeoning green entrepreneur and journalist with a juris doctor from Santa Clara University, School of Law. Currently, he is senior editor and writer of KeenForGreen.com.STOP Uranium Drilling at the Grand Canyon

Friday, July 23, 2010

Dollars for death: why uranium mining should end


Wednesday, March 20, 1996 - 11:00

NORM DIXON summarises the case against uranium mining:

Polluting and wasteful

According to the Movement Against Uranium Mining's Uranium Mining in Australia, no matter how uranium is mined, there will be radioactive contamination of the environment. Uranium tailings are the greatest long-term threat, while leaks, spills and ground water problems are short-term concerns.

Uranium tailings contain 80% of the radioactivity of the original ore because they contain uranium decay products such as thorium and radium. They are easily dispersed by the weather and require containment for hundreds of thousands of years. Tailings containment systems at most uranium mines have a life span of 200-500 years. Tailings dams from past mines have been left to collapse and pollute the areas near Rum Jungle and Moline in the NT.

Mining and processing of uranium consumes vast amounts of raw materials. For example, to produce 3596 tonnes of uranium oxide in 1988-89, Ranger used 4822 tonnes of pyrolusite, 41,217 tonnes of sulphuric acid, 17,311 tonnes of lime, 636 tonnes of ammonia, 625,050 litres of kerosene, and 17,662 litres of tertiary amine.

For each tonne of ore at the Ranger mine, only three kilos of yellowcake are recovered. Huge quantities of waste rock and low grade ore that are not milled, and millions of tonnes of tailings, are produced during the milling process. For every 3600 tonnes of uranium oxide, Ranger produces almost a million tonnes of tailings. Tailings are pumped into a dam after being treated with lime to reduce the solubility of the heavy metals present.

Regulated releases of about 2 million cubic metres of contaminated water from Ranger each wet season carry radioactive radium and toxic pollutants including selenium, copper, lead, cadmium and arsenic down nearby Magela Creek and into the flood plain, contaminating the precious Kakadu ecosystem. After each successive wet season, radioactive wastes have become increasingly concentrated in plants, water and animals. A new mine at Jabiluka would also threaten Magela Creek.

The tailings dam of the now-closed Rum Jungle mine, near Darwin, was breached by monsoon rains, and pollution now extends over 100 square kilometres, including the Finnis River. At Mary Kathleen in the NT, where operations ceased in 1982, 1 million litres of radioactive liquid were deliberately released in February 1984 from the mine's evaporation ponds during an unexpectedly intense wet season. The Fox Report in the 1970s recommended against opening the Koongarra site, located inside a World Heritage Area, in order to protect the South Alligator River.

Uranium mining and milling release large quantities of radioactive radon gas into the atmosphere, as well as ammonia, nitrous oxide, sulphur dioxide and sulphuric acid mist, which kill plants and corrode rock faces. Mt Brockman near the Ranger mine has already suffered corrosion only a few years into the 30-year life of the mine.

Between 1956 and 1972, mining at Moline created 246,000 tonnes of tailings. Within 10 years of the closure of the mill, the tailings dams collapsed, releasing 63,000 tonnes of tailings. When the Office of the Supervising Scientist — established by the federal government to monitor the environmental impact of uranium mining in the NT — surveyed the site, it found significantly higher than normal levels of radioactivity in the flood plains of the creek below the mine and high concentrations of radionuclides in the sediments of the flood plain, as well as high rates of erosion from the tailings dam.


A health hazard

A study of Navajo Indians in the western US found an unusually high number of birth defects, including hydrocephaly, microcephaly, Downs syndrome, cleft lip, cleft palate and epilepsy among more than 500 babies born between 1967 and 1974. Earlier surveys had found a serious increase in bone, ovarian and testicle cancer among children living in areas of former mining activity. The area around the Navajo lands is marked by more than 350 abandoned open-cut uranium mines.

There was also a significant increase in acute leukemia and chronic myelocytic leukemia in Grand Junction, Colorado, where uranium tailings were used in the construction of 6000 homes, schools, shopping centres and footpaths.

The worst tailings-related accident happened in June 1979, when tailings spilled from the Church Rock tailings dam in Colorado into the Rio Puerco River, releasing 3.8 million litres of acidic tailings and 1200 tonnes of solid tailings. The spill extended 64 kilometres downstream through Navajo country, past the town of Gallup, and into the neighbouring state of Arizona, rendering the water in the river and in wells near it unfit for consumption. To this day, water from the Rio Puerco can not be drunk, and livestock from the area cannot be sold.

It's been known since 1920 that uranium miners suffer high mortality from lung cancer caused by exposure to radioactive radon gas during their work. Radon, which decays from radium 226, is an inert gas, heavier than air, with a half-life of about one week. When inhaled, radon gas and its decay products lodge easily in the human lung, emitting energetic alpha particles which affect the vulnerable layer of cells lining the fine tubes in the lung.

Between 1920 and 1957, as new evidence came to light from Hiroshima and Nagasaki, radiation protection authorities revised the maximum permitted radiation dose drastically downwards. However, despite mounting evidence that the current dose is too high, authorities remain reluctant to change the standard. In 1980, the US National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) found "a clear indication that cumulative exposure to radon and its decay products is associated with an increased risk of lung cancer".

NIOSH added that there is "no margin of safety" and called for the permissible exposure limits for all uranium and nuclear workers to be reduced to 1/10 the then current level. Rich ore bodies, such as the one at Jabiluka, which have to be mined underground emit more radon gas and pose a greater threat to workers.

A study done of the Register of Deaths shows that 40% of those who worked underground at the Radium Hill mine in South Australia have died of lung cancer.


Threat to Kakadu

In an interview with Green Left Weekly in September 1994, the NT Environment Centre's campaigns coordinator at the time, Jamie Pittock, outlined what the proposed new mine at Koongarra and Jabiluka would mean for Kakadu's fragile environment.

"Koongarra is in the catchment of the South Alligator River. Kakadu National Park was created for the sole purpose of protecting at least one entire tropical river catchment — the South Alligator — and it defeats the entire purpose of the park to have a uranium mine in that river catchment area. The Koongarra mine is also very close to Nourlangie Rock, which is one of the major visitor attractions of Kakadu.

"The Jabiluka mine poses a more serious threat to the local environment. The original proposal was prepared by a different company. It involved a major surface pit and processing facility at Jabiluka. Energy Resources of Australia [the owners of Ranger] has since bought the Jabiluka lease and is proposing an underground mine with an all-haulage road to the current facilities at Ranger. The Jabiluka mine is near major wetlands, and this road would need to be constructed across Magela Creek, which obviously has major ramifications in the event of an accidental spillage.

"Secondly, the Jabiluka site contains gold as well as uranium, which means that a cyanide processing facility would need to be added to any processing plant. Thirdly, the Jabiluka mine is one of the richest uranium ore bodies in the world, so it is very highly radioactive. It is very unlikely that Jabiluka can be mined without reducing worker health and safety standards ... Of course, most experts are now saying there is no safe dose of radiation."


Nuclear power

Uranium's main use is as fuel in nuclear power stations. Nuclear power station accidents can be as catastrophic as the 1986 disaster at Chernobyl in the Ukraine. MAUM researcher John Hallam in Third Opinion in 1994 pointed out that eight years after the Chernobyl accident, nearly 5 million people in Belarus, Ukraine and Russia live on contaminated land. Even in Britain (which started receiving Chernobyl fallout six days after the accident) there are still 600 farms from which meat consumption is restricted.

Friends of the Earth (Ukraine) said the immediate radiation effects of the accident have already claimed more than 32,000 lives. And in 1993 the World Health Organisation reported a 24-fold increase in thyroid cancers in children. More than 250,000 hectares of contaminated farmland have had to be abandoned.

In 1979, a reactor at the Three Mile Island complex near Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, came within 30 to 60 minutes of a meltdown, which would have released massive amounts of radiation. Australian paediatrician and anti-nuclear activist Dr Helen Caldicott told a Washington anti-nuclear rally a month afterwards: "Three thousand people would have died immediately. Ten to a hundred thousand would be going bald. They would be getting ulcers on their skin, severe vomiting and diarrhoea, and, as their blood cells died, they would be dying of massive haemorrhage or infection ...


In recent months, there have been two significant reactor accidents reported. On December 8, Japan's first power-generating fast breeder reactor, at Monju, leaked sodium from its cooling system. While the government-owned Power Reactor and Nuclear Fuel Development Corporation attempted to cover up the seriousness of the leakage, had the cooling system failed, a catastrophic meltdown could have taken place.

On January 31, there was an accident at a research reactor in Dimitrovgrad in the Ukraine. A construction crane hit vital safety equipment, causing the boiling water reactor to shut down. An estimated 1 tonne of radioactive steam narrowly escaped contaminating the outside environment. Plant officials reported that the radioactive steam contained cobalt, radioactive iodine and manganese.

Nuclear waste remains radioactive for hundreds of thousands of years. There is no safe way to store waste for such long periods. US environmental researcher Peter Montague reports in Rachel's Environment and Health Weekly that in December 1994, the US Department of Energy revealed deadly plutonium inventories were being held at 35 locations in the US in containers prone to leaks and ruptures.

The more than 64,000 containers included plastic bags, glass bottles and metal canisters, "some of which were unlabelled and unmarked. Many of the containers were ruptured or broken; consequently plutonium was reported to have contaminated floors, walls, piping, and doors at several facilities."

"In sum", Montague concluded, "even the wealthiest, most technically advanced nation in the world evidently does not have what it takes to manage these materials safely. Plutonium is among the most toxic materials every discovered ... Somewhere between 28 and 80 micrograms is thought to cause cancer in a human 'with certainty' ... Worse, recent scientific studies reveal that plutonium causes genetic damage to humans, but it's a new kind of damage which may not become evident for several generations."

Read more:
http://www.greenleft.org.au/node/12257

Thursday, July 22, 2010

Church Rock Uranium Spill 31st Anniversary


Church Rock Navajos commemorate 1979 uranium spill

New uranium mining targets Church Rock, where the soil and water remain heavily contaminated

Hello,

My name is Garrett Brennan Stewart, Navajo. My clans are Totsohnii born for T'logi, my maternal grandfather's clan is Naasht'ezhi Tachiinii, and my paternal grandfather's clan is Todichiinii.

The residents of the community group all reside within very close proximity of the abandoned North East Church Rock Mine, which was previously managed by United Nuclear Corporation.

Apparently, the area of the Red Pond Road is highly contaminated, and the concerned parties are trying to come to an agreement as to how the land will be remediated/restored and where the residents will be relocated and for how long.

Enclosed are photos i took at the 31st anniversary march commemorating the 1979 Church Rock Uranium Mill Tailings Spill, including links to video footage which contains bits of information conveyed by Teddy Nez, the president of the Community Group, RWPRCA, and Larry King, resident of Church Rock. There was a 15 minute clip that contained much of Larry's commentary related to the morning of the spill as well as a geiger test of a fenceline on the Abandoned Uranium Mine. Unfortunately, YouTube uploads are limited to 10 minute clips, so I'll edit the piece and upload it again, soon.

This information needs to be shared.

I'd really appreciate it if you could assist us in getting this information out there.

And the YouTube channel of footage I shot on July 16: http://www.youtube.com/user/totsohniinishli

Kind regards,

Garrett Brennan Stewart

Also see: "Indian Country" Nuclear Spill Site Approved Again for Uranium Mining
http://www.honorearth.org/blog/%5Buser%5D/quotindian-countryquot-site-largest-radioactive-release-approved-more

FROM AN INFORMATION SHEET PROVIDED BY US EPA:

The Northeast Church Rock Mine Site, an abandoned uranium mine(AUM), is located about 16 miles northeast of Gallup, New Mexico.

The site is primarily on tribal trust land adjacent to the Navajo Reservation. The site was mined by United Nuclear Corporation (UNC) between 1968 and 1982. UNC holds responsibility for current contamination at the site. Radium and uranium are the contaminants of primary concern at the site.

Radiation and heavy metals in site soils from historic mining practices may pose a significant health risk to human health and to the environment .

People may be exposed to these contaminants through ambient air, soil, surface water, sediment, and by eating plants or animals that are impacted by the site.

The Navajo Nation Environmental Protection Agency (NNEPA) and the USEPA have independently identified the site as the highest priority AUM among the 520 AUMs identified on the Navajo Nation.

This site is the highest priority because it was the largest underground uranium mine in the country and radioactive waste piles continue to spread into the wash and onto the land surrounding several homes located adjacent to the mine.
Read more:

http://bsnorrell.blogspot.com/2010/07/photos-church-rock-uranium-spill-31st.html

Uranium protesters rally held in Fremantle of Australia


Source: Xinhua [13:23 July 21 2010]

Protesters on Wednesday rallied against uranium mining ahead of a conference with major mining companies in Western Australia.


Greens Senator Scott Ludlam, Fremantle Mayor Brad Pettitt and representatives of the Conservation Council, West Australia (WA) Nuclear Free Alliance, Fremantle Anti-Nuclear Group and the Australian Manufacturing Workers Union (AMWU) were among those gathered for the rally outside the Esplanade Hotel in Fremantle of West Australia.

Mia Pepper from the Conservation Council said the protesters wanted to put pressure on the government to ban uranium mining in the state.

Senator Ludlam said uranium mining was far more dangerous than other forms of mining, such as nickel.

"This is an industry that is unsafe, unwanted and uneconomical, " Ludlam told Australian Associated Press (AAP).

AMWU state secretary Steve McCartney said uranium mining regulation was divided among five government departments and three portfolios.

"There are not many statistics because no one is keeping records," McCartney said.

Dr Pettitt, a sustainability expert, said the rally was aimed at raising awareness about the potential hazards of uranium mining.

"We want to make it clear that the majority of WA people don't want uranium mining," Pettitt said.

"It looks like the state government wants to go down the uranium mining path, and for the first time in decades we may actually see uranium mining happen," Pettitt said, adding "

Fremantle has been a nuclear-free city since 2000, and we are against any form of transportation of uranium through Fremantle."

Read more:
http://world.globaltimes.cn/asia-pacific/2010-07/554454.html

Mining: BHP Cautious (uranium mining)

Comment:  Think uranium mining will provide steady, clean jobs, no mining is a boom to burst!  The prices of uranium falls, miners are laid off!  No to uranium mining and milling!

BHP Billiton may be 'cautious' about the outlook for global growth and demand for its many commodities.

The company said in yesterday's 12 month production report that it "continues to be cautious on the short term outlook for the global economy".

But copper, gold and uranium output was affected by the slashing of 80% of the capacity of the huge Olympic Dam mine in South Australia, one of the world's largest copper, hold and uranium mining operations.

Uranium production fell 43%!

Read more:
http://www.asxnewbie.com/mining-resources/mining-bhp-cautious

Wednesday, July 21, 2010

High radiation levels 'more than hundred times' safe level at Wiluna mine / Gov't to probe Wiluna radiation levels


Comment: One government agency said the uranium explorations site was cleanup but they lied....So what is the real truth and just think about the claims that was told to VA senators who went to France to a so called uranium mine restoration site, did they take Geiger counters or take samples of the water. Also the local/Canadian company did core samples at Coles Hill, so have our water and soil been contaminated with uranium....maybe.....we have high Geiger counts around disturb soils in our county! No to uranium mining and milling!

Gov't to probe Wiluna radiation level

MICHAEL BENNETT and NATASHA BODD,

The West Australian
July 21, 2010, 5:25 pm


The Department of Mines and Petroleum has launched an investigation into claims by a Greens MP of dangerously high radiation levels around a former uranium exploration site near the Goldfields mining town of Wiluna.


Greens MP Robin Chapple recently visited two sites at Lake Way, a former uranium exploration site about 20km south east of Wiluna, where he claims he recorded abnormally high levels of radiation on his Geiger counter, alleging that one reading was 100 times higher than normal radiation levels.

A spokesman for Mines and Petroleum Minister Norman Moore said in a statement that while Mr Chapple had not officially informed the Minister or the department about his claims, they would be investigated.

It is understood that similar claims about an area near Kalgoorlie were made earlier this year, but a Department investigation, ordered by Mr Moore, had revealed the claims were erroneous.

"The Department of Mines and Petroleum will act with similar alacrity regarding Mr Chapple's claims and provide the Minister with urgent advice on this issue," he said.

In 2000, Lake Way became the focus of a State Government investigation into claims of dangerous radiation levels, but its findings concluded that levels were safe.

The site, which was a uranium tenement in the 1980s, was explored by mining company CSR but never mined.

Mr Chapple said when he visited Lake Way less than two weeks ago, there was evidence of previous uranium exploration which was supposed to be cleaned up after the investigation ten years ago.

"Both sites had exposed ore left on the surface as a result of the ground disturbing activities associated with exploration work," he said.

"It is quite clearly a problem for the Government who said in 2000 that they would send people out there to clean up the site- well, clearly it hadn't been.

Mr Chapple said at one of the spots where he conducted radiation tests at the Lake Way site, the highest reading he recorded was 10.25 microSieverts per hour, which he said was more than 100 times higher than normal radiation levels.


High radiation levels 'more than hundred times' safe level at Wiluna mine

Narelle Towie
PerthNow
July 21, 2010 3:52PM

RADIATION levels more than 100 times normal background readings have been recorded at an old uranium site, despite the area being "cleaned" a decade ago.

Greens MP Robin Chapple said radiation at the former uranium exploration site, near the Lake Way, 11km from Wiluna, peaked at 143 times the normal range for that area last week.

Wiluna is 950km north-east of Perth.

“Both sites had exposed ore left on the surface as a result of ground disturbing activities associated with exploration work dating back to the 1980s when CSR had the tenement leases,” Mr Chapple said.

Rusting drums containing low-grade uranium were buried in the area in 2000 by officials from the Department of Minerals and Energy after fears were raised by Wiluna Aborigines that they were being exposed to the deadly ore.

At the time, Mines Minister Norman Moore said the area had been "cleaned up to the standards required by the State Mining Engineer and the Radiological Council".

But at one of the sites this week, levels were detected at 7.150 microSieverts per hour of alpha radiation, well above ambient radiation levels worldwide, which are between 0.05 and 0.12 uSv/hr.

“Some bits have been cleaned up but others have just been flattened and they are equally as contaminated now, as they were then,” Mr Chapple said.

“Quite clearly they hadn’t gone over the site and I wouldn’t be surprised if there are some other areas out there which are equally as contaminated.”

Mr Chapple said the area was still highly radioactive with a second location discovered this week just 300m away.

Mr Moore is out of town and was unable to comment on the issue.
“Mr Chapple has not officially made the Minister or the DMP aware of excessive radiation in the area at this point in time.”

Australian Greens Senator for WA Rachel Siewert has used the site to highlight the dangers of uranium mining.

"As the Australian Uranium Summit kicks off, it is crucial that West Australians get the full story,” Ms Siewert said.

“Uranium mining and nuclear power is not clean, it is not safe and it is not cheap.”

Read more:
http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/a/-/breaking/7619445/govt-to-probe-wiluna-radiation-levels/
http://www.perthnow.com.au/business/high-radiation-levels-more-than-hundred-times-safe-level-at-wiluna-mine/story-e6frg2qc-1225895230599

County officials head to D.C. to push for continued funding for Atlas cleanup



Comment:  Again, no uranium mining anywhere, it will ruin our water, air and land plus our lives!

by Craig Bigler
contributing writer

Efforts by Grand County to lobby Congress to continue funding the Atlas uranium tailings cleanup effort are moving into a higher gear, county officials said this week.

Grand County Council members Bob Greenberg and Pat Holyoak, who represent the council on tailings removal matters, informed the council they will meet with federal officials in Washington, D.C., over several days during the first week of August.

Greenberg and Holyoak will make the county’s case that Congress should continue to provide funding at current levels even after federal stimulus funds run out at the end of September 2011, Greenberg said.

Sutley is a former member of the board of directors of the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California.

The council’s letter notes the Metropolitan Water District’s ongoing interest in removing the threat to water supplies downriver from Moab by relocating the 16 million tons of contaminated material away from the banks of the Colorado River.

The Colorado River is the primary source of drinking water for millions of people who live downstream of Moab in Nevada, Arizona and California.

The county delegation will go to Washington D.C. armed with a policy paper prepared by county staff. A copy of that paper, “Moab UMTRA Project: Keep it Moving,” was also sent to Sutley. The paper explains that the 16 million tons of Cold War-era uranium tailings now rest in an unlined pile, next to the Colorado River, threatening the water supplies for 22 million people.

The paper refers to periodic floods and windstorms that increase the likelihood of risks as long as the uranium tailings remain in their current location..

The 2008 Defense Authorization Bill mandated completion of the project by 2019, but it did not address funding to make that timeline possible.

The original Department of Energy plan will be put back in play if additional funding is not obtained, according to DOE officials. The DOE plan scheduled completion of the project by 2028.

Read more:
http://www.moabtimes.com/pages/full_story/push?article-County+officials+head+to+D-C-+to+push+for+continued+funding+for+Atlas+cleanup%20&id=8561607&instance=secondary_five_leftcolumn

Agency plans second meeting on Areva project

Comment:  So the NRC really did not want to have a second meeting with the public but later agreed to have the meeting.  The NRC is just nuke pushers!  No to uranium mining, milling and anything nuke related!

by Associated Press
KTVB.COM
Posted on July 20, 2010 at 10:35 AM

BOISE -- The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has agreed to hold a public meeting in Boise on a proposal by French nuclear giant Areva Inc. to build a uranium enrichment plan in eastern Idaho.

The federal agency initially rejected a request for a second meeting in Idaho to take public comment on the project.

The Snake River Alliance opposes Areva's $4 billion Eagle Rock plant, saying the nuclear facility could have a profound impact on the state and region.

The company intends to produce fuel for nuclear reactors at the facility.

The NRC is hosting its the Boise public meeting Aug. 9, then a second in Idaho Falls Aug. 12.

Read more:
http://www.ktvb.com/news/local/Agency-plans-second-meeting-on-Areva-project-98839719.html

Tuesday, July 20, 2010

Uranium Mining in Virginia



Banister River in Halifax, VA

Comment:  Great letter!  No to uranium mining and milling!

To the Editor:

I would like to respond to the two letters touting uranium mining that appeared in many local newspapers.

The first letter from Mr. Cecil Cardwell attempted to throw uranium mining in the same pot with nuclear power. That should never be done as there is a world of difference between the two. The biggest perhaps being that uranium mining leaves behind millions of tons of radioactive waste and other toxic and leachable heavy metals. Mining is the dirty end of the whole nuclear power business.

If uranium is mined at Coles Hill the millions of tons of tailings left behind will forever release deadly radon gas into the air, and floods will forever breach dams to contaminate land and water. There is no way to prevent this from happening and no way to clean it up when it does. The surrounding area will then become uninhabitable.

Today, uranium is mined in sparsely populated and arid regions mostly in third world countries. Civilized and intelligent human beings would never mine uranium in an area like Virginia that is blessed with abundant rainfall and lush vegetation.

The second letter from Mr. Robert Bodnar, Ph. D., and professor of geochemistry at Virginia Tech points out our “great” need for uranium. That is simply not the case. Experts in the field contend that we have well over 1000 years supply of uranium sitting around in stockpiles and scrapped military war-heads, and uranium is plentiful on the open market. Mr. Bodnar also touts the supposedly, pie-in-the-sky predictions of economic boom from uranium mining. He fails to mention that the perception and stigma of uranium mining will drive many businesses away and will effectively kill future economic development in the region.

Over the years I have found that the only people who support uranium mining are those who are ignorant of the consequences and those who hope to make money from it. Both of these gentlemen seem to fit both of these categories as each is on the payroll of an institution that seeks to benefit from uranium mining at Coles Hill and neither seems to have knowledge of the many, deadly, documented health risks associated with uranium mining. Then again, maybe they just don’t care.

Water is worth more than uranium.

Sincerely,
Jack Dunavant
Halifax, VA

Selling our souls (uranium mining)

Comments:  According to USGS, we have young water and fracture rocks which has ruin our water, that is enough to stop uranium mining ever in VA!

By Published by The Editorial Board
Published: July 20, 2010

To the editor:

The Danville Regional Foundation is currently reviewing proposals from two firms to conduct a socioeconomic study of the effects of uranium mining, milling and long-term waste management on this area.

The proposals are available online at DRF’s website and public comment is invited.

I have read both proposals and remain convinced that the only study necessary is that of a “worst-case scenario.”

Anything more is simply time and money wasted on deciding how much money will it take for us to be willing to gamble all we have and all our children will have.

Calculated facts and figures (still guesses) mean nothing in the aftermath of natural or manmade disaster, and all one has to do is open a newspaper to see how common they (disasters) are.

In the mining scenario, “risk management” is an oxymoron. There is only risk, save for a few. Should the moratorium be lifted, the risk will be not only ours but our “innocent bystander” neighbors throughout this state and surrounding ones. Thirty years, plus or minus, of waiting for the other shoe to drop.

So if the only interest is arriving at that dollar figure, I suppose either company will do. I guess they know more about what our souls are worth than we do.

LINDA WORSLEY
Chatham, VA

http://www2.godanriver.com/gdr/news/opinion/letters_to_the_editor/danville_letters/article/selling_our_souls/22944/

Monday, July 19, 2010

Scientists Back Navajos' Uranium Mining Fight: Tribe fears contamination of drinking water




BRENDA NORRELL
Indian Country
15mar04

RED ROCK, N.M. - Navajos fighting proposed uranium mining in an area once devastated by a radioactive spill, were bolstered by scientists who criticized the Nuclear Regulatory Commission for approving new uranium mining that could result in the contamination of drinking water for 15,000 Navajos and ultimately lead to kidney failure.

"I’ve never seen such poor science, poor accountability and poor traceability," said Mike Wallace, a groundwater hydrologist who has worked in the nuclear industry at WIPP in New Mexico and the Yucca Mountain site in Nevada.

Speaking to Navajos gathered at Red Rock State Park, Wallace said the final environmental impact statement for the uranium mining proposed by Hydro Resources, Inc., for Crownpoint and Church Rock, is flawed.

Referring to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s approval of a license, now being challenged by interveners, Wallace said, "They are not taking this area or these people’s concerns seriously."

Mitchell Capitan, Navajo cofounder of the grassroots group Eastern Navajo Against Uranium Mining (ENDAUM) told the gathering: Speaking in Diné and English, Capitan said, "There’s always going to be accidents. Our water is more sacred and our water is clean; they want to dirty the water in our communities."

Richard Abitz, geo-chemist and environmental scientist, urged Navajos to stop the legacy of uranium mining now. "There is a gross misrepresentation of the geological structure in the final environmental impact statement."

'They think in-situ mining will be done easily without contamination or accidents, but that is not the case.'
— Mitchell Capitan Eastern Navajo Against Uranium Mining

Wallace predicted that nearby drinking wells of the Navajo Tribal Utility Authority and BIA will be contaminated. "In five years time, the uranium contaminated water would reach the NTUA well. In 10 years, it would reach the BIA well.

"It is enough to cause renal damage.

"These wells are the sole source of drinking water for thousands of people that live in the area."

Abitz said in-situ leaching uses a hydrogen peroxide mixture to strip the uranium from the rock, which kills tissue and destroys cells in human and animal life. The addition of oxygen and sodium bicarbonate called oxygenates causes uranium and other radioactive substances and trace metals to be liberated from the rock into the groundwater.

Further, he warned that it would be HRI who would be responsible for monitoring the wells and taking action if there is an accident, spill or emergency. Urging a halt to the proposal, Abitz said, "Water is needed for life, uranium is not needed for life. We can get by without uranium, we can not get by without water."

Abitz said judges have too often taken the stance that they are judges who know nothing of the mining industry and accept the data of corporations, claiming the corporations are in the know.

"It is a fallacy," said Abitz, who manages restoration of uranium-contaminated groundwater at the government’s Fernald uranium plant near Cincinnati, Ohio.

Abitz said the water taken from the extremely pristine Westwater Canyon Aquifer near Crownpoint for uranium mining and used for flushing out chemicals would not be replaced in our lifetimes.

Currently, the pristine water meets the high standard of the World Health Organization. The clean water standard is 0.002 mg of uranium contamination per liter.

"It takes hundreds, perhaps thousands of years, to transform aquifer water back into a drinkable condition. Abitz agreed with Wallace that there is no doubt that the contamination will reach Navajo water supplies. "It will make its way into the Crownpoint water supply."

Abitz said the number of Navajos already suffering from diabetes, which also affects kidney functions, compounds the risk of renal failure. "Uranium is toxic to the kidneys, it slows down kidney function."

Mitchell Capitan said when ENDAUM formed 10 years ago, Navajos had no idea they would be fighting HRI for a decade.

"We don’t want that uranium mining polluting our clean water, our clean air."

Read more:
http://www.mindfully.org/Nucs/2004/Navajo-Uranium-Fight15mar04.htm
source: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4535148/ 16mar04